ARTICLE
8 October 2018

Alternative Investment Liquidity Should Determine Asset Manager Compensation: AIMA Study

KL
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Contributor

Kramer Levin provides its clients proactive, creative and pragmatic solutions that address today’s most challenging legal issues. The firm is headquartered in New York with offices in Silicon Valley and Paris and fosters a strong culture of involvement in public and community service. For more information, visit www.kramerlevin.com
Ten years on from the 2008 financial crisis, some of the market conditions from that time are returning, including contracted liquidity ...
United States Finance and Banking

Source

Ten years on from the 2008 financial crisis, some of the market conditions from that time are returning, including contracted liquidity, according to Tom Kehoe Global Head of Research, AIMA. In a research study, AIMA explores the issue of liquidity and alternative investments, looking at several facets. Kehoes explains that since 2008, asset managers collaborated and formed bespoke liquidity conditions for specific alternative investment funds to match the requirements of invested instruments, and established investor-level gates to prevent forced portfolio liquidation to meet redemptions. He argues that from an investor perspective, portfolio and fund liquidity should work together, as liquid funds provide less space to gate or suspend redemptions. Since alternative investments can offer greater liquidity, the assets managers handling them should be compensated accordingly, unless investors agree to lower fees and longer lock-ups.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More