ARTICLE
19 March 2020

Federal Register: SEC Requests Input On ICA "Names Rule"

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The SEC requested comment on the effectiveness of the framework governing the names of registered investment companies and business development companies.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The SEC requested comment on the effectiveness of the framework governing the names of registered investment companies and business development companies. The notice was published in the Federal Register. Comments must be received by May 5, 2020.

As previously covered, Investment Company Act ("ICA") Rule 35d-1 ("Names Rule") prohibits registered investment companies from using a name that is likely to mislead investors. Rule 35d-1 provides, in part, that when an investment company refers to a certain type of asset (e.g., equities) in its name, at least 80 percent of the investment company must be invested in that type of asset. The SEC stated that it is assessing whether the existing rule is effective in prohibiting the use of deceptive names of funds, as well as whether alternative frameworks should be considered.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More