ARTICLE
7 August 2012

Online Hotel Bookings: The OFT Objects

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

On 31 July 2012 the OFT issued a Statement of Objections (SO) alleging that Booking.com B.V. (Booking.com), Expedia Inc (Expedia), InterContinental Hotels Group plc (IHG) and Hotel Inter-Continental London Limited (ICL) have contravened competition law.
United Kingdom Antitrust/Competition Law

On 31 July 2012 the OFT issued a Statement of Objections (SO) alleging that Booking.com B.V. (Booking.com), Expedia Inc (Expedia), InterContinental Hotels Group plc (IHG) and Hotel Inter-Continental London Limited (ICL) have contravened competition law.
The investigation was launched in September 2010, following a complaint by skoosh.com that it was being prevented from selling at below the "rate parity" room rate.  Please see the analysis of the initial complaint in our CMS journal "Hospitality Matters".

The OFT has looked at activity since January 2007.  It considers that separate arrangements by each of Expedia and Booking.com with IHG restrict the agent's ability to offer discounted hotel rooms.  The OFT proposes to find that the breach of the competition rules by Expedia, IHG and ICL lasted from October 2007 to September 2010 and that the infringement involving Booking.com, IHG and ICL lasted from January 2007 and is ongoing.

The OFT's concern is that the arrangements could limit price competition between online travel agents and make it more difficult for online travel agents to start up and develop discount offerings.  OFT Chief Executive Clive Maxwell said that the OFT "wants people to benefit fully from being able to shop around online and get a better deal from discounters that are prepared to share their commission with customers".

Potential involvement of other hotel groups and booking operators

The OFT wanted to be able to move swiftly and decisively, so chose to limit the investigation to a small number of major companies.  Expedia and Booking.com are two of the largest online travel agents in the UK.  They operate different business models. IHG is the largest international hotel chain measured by room numbers.

The OFT's press release makes clear, however, that "the investigation is likely to have wider implications as the alleged practices are potentially widespread in the industry".  Hotel groups and online booking agents alike will want to take note of this warning and consider their positions.

The industry is big business in the UK, with UK hotel room revenue amounting to approximately £10.1 billion in 2010.  The OFT notes that the UK's online travel agency sector is the largest in Europe and that the transaction value of UK hotel accommodation booked through online travel agents amounted to approximately £849m in 2010 (see notes to OFT press release).  This investigation concentrated on hotel accommodation that is offered on a "standalone" basis, not combined with flights or car hire or other travel components.

What next?

The announcement is a provisional view, but it clearly points the direction in which the OFT is moving.  An SO is formal notice to those under investigation of the OFT's proposed infringement decision under the Competition Act 1998.  Booking.com, Expedia and IHG will have an opportunity to respond to the OFT's statement and the OFT will consider all those representations before issuing a final decision.

An SO is confidential and will not be published.  However, any company which wishes to comment on the OFT's provisional findings, and which is in a position materially to assist the OFT in testing its factual, legal or economic arguments, may request a non-confidential version of the SO by contacting the OFT no later than 28 August 2012.  Details are available on the OFT's web pages dedicated to the investigation.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 01/08/2012.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More