ARTICLE
10 January 2019

Second Medical Use Patents In Europe: Are UK And Germany Swapping Approaches?

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
This White Paper defines "second medical use" claims and explains the "roles of intent" and "plausibility" in these infringement cases.
United Kingdom Intellectual Property

The UK Supreme Court's ruling in Warner Lambert v Actavis resulted from deliberations over the proper approach to matters relating to infringement of second medical use patent claims. The standard proposed by the UK Supreme Court diverges from the approach of German courts and will likely lead to important consequences for pharmaceutical patent litigation in Europe.

This White Paper defines "second medical use" claims and explains the "roles of intent" and "plausibility" in these infringement cases.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More