A fortuitous ferry crossing
Rather fortuitously, I moved to Northern Ireland about six months before COVID-19 struck. Instead of lockdown in my old flat with its small garden backing onto a tube line (which had been great for the morning commute) I had lakes, mountains, beaches, farms and a winter wetsuit!
Like countless others who moved to the great outdoors in other constituent parts of the UK as a result of the pandemic, I could make this move because Northern Island is part of the United Kingdom. I didn't need a visa or any formal immigration documents – though there will be a record somewhere of my ferry crossing – maybe more than one record as we missed the first ferry.
It struck me that there are comparisons to be drawn from my relatively minor move in 2019 with the more major journey of those who emigrated to the UK from the Caribbean between 1948 and 1971. We now know them as the Windrush generation after the 'MV Empire Windrush', one of the first ships which carried those wishing to move to the UK to help fill post-war labour shortages.
The similarity is that they too could make this move because their home countries were then part of the British Commonwealth. They were British subjects.
The Windrush scandal
The 1971 Immigration Act brought an end to this ability to live and work in the UK. It granted Commonwealth citizens already living in the UK indefinite leave to remain but going forward other British passport holders who wished to make this move could only do so with a work permit and proof that a parent or grandparent had been born in the UK. So the government put the Windrush generation's indefinite leave to remain on statutory footing, but like my situation did not keep or issue any records. In fact in 2010 it destroyed their landing cards.
Fast forward to 2018 and media coverage of the Windrush scandal. As part of its robust stance on immigration (to put it mildly), the Home Office began to detain, deport and deny the basic rights of the Windrush generation. People who had lived in the UK for half a century and more were suddenly required to prove that they had a right to remain in the UK or leave. Many simply did not have passports and could not provide documentary proof that they moved to the UK before 1973 or for each year that they had lived in the UK as demanded by the Home Office. Yes, in 2018, people (many of whom were elderly) who could have been our friends, neighbours or colleagues lost medical care, their jobs, their homes and their freedom almost overnight.
If in 50 years' time (aged uh hum...) I'm still in Northern Island and I, or my children, are asked to prove that we arrived there in 2019 or face detention, deportation and destitution, I'm not certain we could.
Theresa May has since apologised and following a government review – which is said to show the scandal was not an accident but a result of government policy against non-white immigration (one wonders how they chose their victims) – the government has set up the Windrush Compensation Scheme. Unfortunately, the scheme does not appear to be fit for purpose. For example, the application form is 18 pages, the application guidance is 45 pages, the scheme rules are set out over 46 pages and there is limited access to affordable legal advice. There is also a backlog in applications for people in real need of compensation and, to make things worse, the scheme is administered by the Home Office itself rather than independently (yes the same department and people who very recently committed these atrocities are determining whether an applicant is eligible for compensation and, if so, how much). Somebody missed 'Justice 101'.
How you can help
I'm not an immigration law specialist (and should apologise for any legal inaccuracies above – I'm blaming the need for brevity and – hopefully – impact), but I would like to help if I can. And I will be able to because Withers is going to be providing pro bono support to the Windrush Justice Clinic which provides free advice to potential applicants to the Windrush Compensation Scheme.
UK Black History Month seems like a good time to announce this – although sadly this scandal from 2018 only just qualifies as 'history'.
Thank you for taking the time to read the first update in our UK Black History Month series and look out for next week's update where Jamie Brown will be shining a spotlight on footballer and social justice campaigner Marcus Rashford.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.