ARTICLE
11 February 2025

FCA Accelerates Progress On Consolidation Review

M
Macfarlanes

Contributor

We are a distinctive law firm, combining expertise, agility, and a client-centric culture to address the most challenging legal demands and foster innovation. Our firm is structured around the needs of our clients, with whom we build long-lasting relationships, tackling complex issues in key practice areas.

Our approach is focused and deliberate. We assist clients with major transactions, including M&A, real estate, and financial products; handle significant litigation and investigations; and provide comprehensive private capital advice, particularly through our leading private client practice.

With offices in London and Brussels, and a strong international network, we collaborate with top lawyers globally to deliver the highest level of service. Our firm’s human-sized culture emphasizes long-term careers, fostering a cohesive, entrepreneurial environment where every team member can thrive.

With the FCA's consolidation review proceeding at pace, boards of regulated firms as well as buyers and sellers need to review their regulatory capital structures...
United Kingdom Consumer Protection

With the FCA's consolidation review proceeding at pace, boards of regulated firms as well as buyers and sellers need to review their regulatory capital structures, prior to filing change in control applications with the regulator or indeed undertaking any significant engagement with the FCA on their group structures.

In announcing its review, the FCA was clear in October 2024 that it would be prepared to exercise its broad power under section 143(J) and 55L(3) of Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to require an overseas parent undertaking to be swapped for a UK parent company instead, with potentially material consequences for the size and scope of the regulatory consolidation group, where there are UK MiFID investment firms in the buyer and/or target group. The review should be considered not just when applying for authorisation and variation of permission, but also more generally when designing new group structures, seeking permission to apply the group capital test, and filing for change in control (as well as drafting change in control clauses) in M&A transactions in connection with these groups.

Where previously buyers might have carried out limited regulatory due diligence on their targets and perhaps not assessed in detail client (and specifically consumer) harms in the target group, the risks of taking this type of light touch approach, are now more acute. Prior to undertaking M&A, there needs to be a clear understanding of how the FCA perceives regulatory risk in both the buyer and seller groups.

Since these considerations are tightly intertwined with the FCA's objectives for the Consumer Duty, those groups which demonstrate poor Consumer Duty compliance, for example those which have high numbers of FOS complaints, negative social media or press commentary or whose filings to the FCA on the Consumer Duty were rather superficial, will also be more exposed under this review. Care needs to be applied when responding to the new Consumer Duty questions, as well as the group regulatory capital questions in the FCA's change in control forms.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More