ARTICLE
1 May 2025

The Law Of The Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court's Decision In UniCredit Bank GmbH v. RusChemAlliance LLC

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Counsel Cem Kalelioğlu co-authored an article published in IPRax.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Counsel Cem Kalelioğlu co-authored an article published in IPRax. The article analyzes the UK Supreme Court's decision in UniCredit v RusChemAlliance [2024] UKSC 30 and addresses two main themes of the Supreme Court's decision – (i) anti-suit injunctions against Russian courts' assumption of jurisdiction despite the existence of a valid arbitration agreement; and (ii) the law governing the arbitration agreement.

Click here to continue reading.

Originally published by IPRax on 28 April 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More