A market study focusing on the conditions of competition in relation to investment and corporate banking services has been launched by the UK Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"). The study will cover services provided in the United Kingdom, but the FCA's findings could reverberate more widely in view of the international significance of the UK banking and financial sectors.
If the FCA concludes that competition is not working well, it may impose market-wide remedies, firm-specific remedies, or make a market investigation reference to the Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA").
The market study will focus on the following three topics, in respect of primary market and related activities:
(i) Choice of banks and advisers – namely, the competitive landscape generally, clients' purchasing behaviour and in particular the impact of syndication, and entry and expansion including the potential effects of regulation.
(ii) Limited transparency – namely, adequacy of information, transparency of the process of allocation of debt or equity, and the impact of established practices, processes or regulations on transparency in the IPO process.
(iii) Bundling and cross-subsidisation – namely, whether bundling and/or cross-subsidisation occurs, and whether such bundling and/or cross-subsidisation has adverse effects on competition and clients.
The UK financial markets have been under close scrutiny since the financial crisis of 2008. Since then, a broad range of actions has been initiated, resulting in the imposition of sanctions on firms and individuals.
Following preparatory steps taken in 2014 and early 2015, the FCA announced on 22 May 2015 its decision to launch a market study into investment and corporate banking services.
The FCA has invited interested parties to submit comments by 22 June 2015 on the issues identified in the terms of reference of the study, and also intends to host a number of roundtable and/or bilateral meetings with interested parties.
The FCA aims to publish an interim report setting out any concerns identified by it, as well as any proposed remedies, and to publish a final report in the Spring of 2016.
Who is affected?
The diagram below provides a (non-exhaustive) summary of the scope of the market study:
The FCA wishes to hear from a wide range of firms with different business models and client profiles, including firms which provide a combination of both investment and corporate banking services, standalone investment banks which offer services such as underwriting securities and trading and brokerage services, corporate banks that are deposit takers and loan makers for corporate and large businesses, boutique investment banks that specialise in a specific service client type or industry, and advisers.
What can the FCA do?
The FCA has launched the market study on the basis of its powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA"). It might instead have used its new "concurrent powers" under the Enterprise Act 2002, which it acquired on 1 April 2015, namely the power shared with the CMA and other sector regulators to apply UK competition law. A consequence of using its FSMA market study powers is that the FCA is not bound by a statutory timetable.
If the FCA concludes that competition is not working well, it may intervene to promote effective competition using a number of possible measures. These include rule making, publishing general guidance and proposing enhanced industry self-regulation.
The FCA could also impose firm-specific remedial measures such as own initiative variation powers or own initiative requirement powers, cancelling permissions, public censure, imposition of financial penalties, and filing for injunction or restitution orders. Alternatively, it could make a reference to the CMA for an in-depth
What can you expect if your firm's activities fall within the scope of the market study?
The FCA will shortly begin to gather information and will therefore be seeking data, information and/or views from firms whose activities fall with the scope of the investigation.
The FCA may ask firms to submit information on a voluntary basis, or it may use its formal information gathering powers under FSMA. It may also share information and co-ordinate with other authorities, such as the Prudential Regulation Authority and CMA.
Responding to the FCA's information requests may be burdensome, and care will be required in the preparation of responses.
Many of the activities falling within the scope of the market study have not previously been subjected to detailed scrutiny by the UK competition authorities, and conduct that may have been viewed as normal market practice for many years may be called into question.
The FCA is unusual among the world's financial sector regulators in enjoying full competition enforcement powers in addition to its regulatory powers. As well as the various forms of intervention referred to in the previous section, the FCA could also use information gathered by it in the exercise of its regulatory powers to enforce the competition rules against individual companies.
The launch of the market study is also a timely reminder of the need for firms to ensure that their practices, documentation and compliance procedures are in line with the requirements of UK and EU competition law.
Originally published 3 June 2015
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2015. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.