ARTICLE
31 October 2024

Warning To Research Companies: Inform First, Then Obtain Consent

E
Egemenoglu

Contributor

Egemenoglu is one of the largest full-service law firms in Turkey, advising market-leading clients since 1968. Egemenoğlu who is proud to hold many national and international clients from different sectors, is appreciated by both his clients and the Turkish legal market with his fast, practical, rigorous and solution-oriented work in a wide range of fields of expertise. Egemenoğlu has been considered worthy of various rankings by the world’s most leading and esteemed rating institutions and legal guides. We have been ranked as Recognized in “Project and Finance” and “Mergers and Acquisitions” areas by IFLR 1000. We also take place among the top- tier law firms of Turkey at the rankings of Legal 500, at which world’s best law firms are regarded, in “Employment Law” and “Real Estate / Construction” areas. Also our firm is regarded as significant by Chambers& Partners in “Employment Law” area as well.
After the number of complaints to the Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority"), the Authority published a Public Announcement on "Personal Data Processing Activities of Research Companies...
Turkey Privacy

After the number of complaints to the Personal Data Protection Authority ("Authority"), the Authority published a Public Announcement on "Personal Data Processing Activities of Research Companies by Using "Random-Digit Dialing as a Method of Telephone Sampling" for the purpose of Statistical Research" ("Public Announcement").

What does the Subject of Complaints?

It is related to the fact that although the persons concerned did not share their telephone numbers with the research companies in any way, they were called by the research companies and they were not informed about this issue.

The Arguement of Research Companies

The research companies stated that the telephone numbers are randomly and automatically generated by the system/software and that the method used for the calls is a statistical methodology known as the "random-digit dialing as a method of telephone sampling" method, which is applied worldwide. They also expressed that they obtain the consent of the data subjects; if the consent is not given by the data subjects, they retain data by Pseudonymisation method.

The Authority's Detection

The following assessments are made by the Authority regarding the incident in question.

  • Since the person can be identified through the automatically generated telephone number, the processing of personal data is involved.
  • If personal data is retained using the Pseudonymization method, personal data processing will still be relevant. This method is not an anonymization technique.
  • Compliance with the principles of privacy by design and privacy by default must be ensured. The data controller should implement measures such that the software's factory settings only perform processing activities necessary for the purpose of processing.
  • At the first instance of communication in case personal data are used to communicate with the data subject, the privacy policy must be presented to them.
  • After the information is provided, the phone call should continue only if the data subjects give their explicit consent.

Assessment

The Authority underlined in the Public Announcement that the use of a pseudonym does not anonymise personal data. Additionally, the criterion of directly identifying the data subject is not adequate for personal data processing activity; a personal data processing activity will also be relevant when the data subject is identifiable. For instance, if a research company collects information such as the place of residence and economic characteristics of the data subject without identifying information details like the name and surname of the data subject, this data still constitutes personal data processing, as it can be linked to identifiable individuals.

Another important point from the Public Announcement is that the legal requirement for explicit consent aligns with the Authority's Principle Decision, which states that the processing of personal data by research companies only for the purpose of profit or economic benefit is inadequate for assessing legitimate interest. However, to the extent necessary for the research, explicit consent will not be required for the processing of information such as the date and duration of the call of the data subjects, the caller number and the traffic log in the form of the number called, which may be based on the legitimate interest of the data controller.

Conclusion

The decisions of the Authority must be complied with. In this context, data controllers should analyse the effects of the Public Announcement on their personal data processing processes.

You can access the full Public Announcement here.3

Footnotes

1. https://www.kvkk.gov.tr/Icerik/5434/2019-78

2. https://www.kvkk.gov.tr/Icerik/7989/-Arastirma-Sirketlerinin-Istatistiksel-Arastirma-Yapmak-Amaciyla-Rastgele-Numara-Cevirme-ile-Telefon-Mulakati-Yontemi-Kullanarak-Gerceklestirdikleri-Kisisel-Veri-Isleme-Faaliyetleri-Hakkinda-Kamuoyu-Duyurusu

3. https://www.kvkk.gov.tr/Icerik/7989/-Arastirma-Sirketlerinin-Istatistiksel-Arastirma-Yapmak-Amaciyla-Rastgele-Numara-Cevirme-ile-Telefon-Mulakati-Yontemi-Kullanarak-Gerceklestirdikleri-Kisisel-Veri-Isleme-Faaliyetleri-Hakkinda-Kamuoyu-Duyurusu

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More