ARTICLE
3 August 2017

CEO Of A Russian Entity Disqualified For Violation Of Russian Antitrust Laws

N
Noerr

Contributor

Noerr logo
Firm in Russia. Since the Moscow office opened in 1994, Noerr has established a strong reputation for highly complex corporate and commercial work in Russia. A strong team of 25+ Russian and international experts (including 9 partners) provides a multitude of corporate clients with premium full service advice on all legal and tax matters of their Russian businesses. In 2019 Noerr celebrates its 25-years anniversary in Russia.
This is a sign of the Russian antitrust authority's fight against bid rigging, now in practice inflicting personal liability on the individuals involved.
Russian Federation Antitrust/Competition Law

In what is apparently the first court case in this respect, the Moscow Commercial (Arbitrazh) Court ordered the disqualification of the CEO of a Russian legal entity for violation of Russian antitrust laws. This is a sign of the Russian antitrust authority's fight against bid rigging, now in practice inflicting personal liability on the individuals involved.
 
In a tender relating to office equipment, OOO TIRION and OOO Company FILAKS had agreed to rig the bidding to maintain prices. The companies' actions were in violation of Russian antitrust laws and both of the companies were fined.
 
In addition, taking into account the seriousness of the violation, a claim was filed by the antitrust authorities at the Moscow Commercial (Arbitrazh) Court seeking an order to disqualify the General Director (CEO) of OOO Company FILAKS from serving as CEO. The court upheld the claim and disqualified the General Director of OOO Company FILAKS for a period of one year.
 
"The fight against cartels is one of the priorities of the antimonopoly service. The decision of the Moscow Commercial (Arbitrazh) Court on the disqualification of a company officer for participation in cartel collusion is a precedent in the field of fighting against cartels and other anti-competitive agreements." commented the Deputy Head of the UFAS of Moscow Region, Alexey Azarenko.
 
In recent years there were several cases of disqualification of state officials, but disqualification of a CEO of a legal entity is a precedent and a clear signal that the risk of individual liability has shifted from theoretical to real.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More