ARTICLE
10 November 2021

Effective Technologies And Innovations To Tackle Climate Change Already Exist

R
Rouse

Contributor

Rouse is an IP services business focused on emerging markets. We operate as a closely integrated network to provide the full range of intellectual property services, from patent and trade mark protection and management to commercialisation, global enforcement and anti-counterfeiting.
Fabrice Mattei has published the summary of his proposal he has presented at COP 26 to encourage the dissemination of existing technologies to tackle climate change.
Myanmar Intellectual Property

How to push for their diffusion?

Fabrice Mattei has published the summary of his proposal he has presented at COP 26 to encourage the dissemination of existing technologies to tackle climate change.

  • Technology transfers (TT) of environmental sound technologies (ESTs) play a critical role in the effective global response to the climate change challenge.
  • The UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement recognize the importance of the diffusion of ESTs to developing countries and least development countries (LDCs) to improve resilience to climate change.
  • As the most vulnerable countries to Climate Change, developing countries and LDCs make their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) heavily conditional on international support, including TT, for, in some cases, up to 55 % reduction of GHG emissions.
  • However, an estimated of only 15 % of patented ESTs are actually diffused in developing countries and LDCs.
  • The implementation of a revenue-neutral national carbon tax targeting unused patented ESTs is recommended to incentivize their diffusion at the scale and speed required to meet developing countries and LDCs' NDC objectives.
  • Revenue generated from the tax will be reinvested into R&D in ESTs, green jobs and adaptation measures.

The proposed carbon tax covering patented but undiffused ESTs demonstrates that the optimal taxation of a patent depends on its social cost. Coupling a carbon tax with a patent system provides for a more efficient policy than to separately correct each externality with help of an environmentally neutral patent system, such as compulsory licensing, and a carbon tax disconnected from the competition regime associated with the patent regime.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More