ARTICLE
13 September 2024

Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd v. The Federal Republic Of Nigeria: What Are The Facts?

TA
Tope Adebayo LP

Contributor

Established in 2008, Tope Adebayo LP offers holistic solutions in energy, disputes, and corporate transactions. Our diverse team crafts bespoke strategies for clients, driving industry wins and growth. We are a one-stop shop, licensed for legal, finance, and corporate services, with a global network for seamless cross-border transactions.
A lot has been said about the ex parte order granted by the Judicial Court of Paris on 14th August 2024 for the interim attachment of three aircrafts belonging to the Nigerian government. This development...
Nigeria Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

A lot has been said about the ex parte order granted by the Judicial Court of Paris on 14th August 2024 for the interim attachment of three aircrafts belonging to the Nigerian government. This development has generated several scholarly and enlightening discussions on the legal intricacies stemming from this action (especially as it relates to International Law), such as, how the concept of attribution applies in international investment arbitration and a host of others.

What actually gave rise to the arbitral award that precipitated the grant of the ex-parte order in the first place? What are the facts of the case? This is what this article seeks to explore. Before that, it would be prudent to first take a peek at the China – Nigeria Bilateral Investment Treaty which is the fulcrum of the arbitral proceedings against Nigeria.

How did we get here? The China – Nigeria Bilateral Investment Treaty

This agreement was entered between the two countries (Governments of the Peoples' Republic of China and the Federal Republic of Nigeria – Contracting Parties) for the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments in both States (hereinafter "BIT").

For the purpose of the agreement, Article 1 of the treaty set out the definition of terms. In this regard, Article 1 (1) defined investment to mean every kind of asset invested by the investors of one contracting party in accordance with the laws of the other contracting party including but not limited to movable & immovable properties, shares, debentures, stock and any other kind of participation in companies, intellectual property rights etc. By Article 1 (2), investor was defined to include nationals and companies of both contracting parties.

The contracting parties also agreed among other things that, investments of investors in either contracting party are to enjoy continuous protection in the territory of the other contracting party and subject to laws and regulations, neither contracting party is to take unreasonable or discriminatory measures against the management, maintenance, use, enjoyment and disposal of the investment by the investors of the other contracting party. As to how these investments should be treated, the parties agreed among other things in Article 3 BIT that, the investment of investors of each contracting party shall all the time be accorded , national treatment, most-favoured-nation treatment, and fair and equitable treatment in the territory of the other contracting party.

To read the full article, kindly download the PDF

Download

To view original Tope Adebayo article, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More