ARTICLE
30 April 2018

Know what you are getting into – personal guarantees carry risk

WW
Wynn Williams Lawyers

Contributor

Wynn Williams is a renowned law firm in New Zealand, offering a full range of legal services with a team of skilled lawyers. Established in 1859, the firm is known for its expertise, straightforward advice, and strong client relationships. Recognized in prestigious legal directories, Wynn Williams is proud of its heritage and commitment to honest, experienced guidance for clients. Offices are located in Auckland, Christchurch, and Queenstown.
The takeaway point from this case - care must be taken in providing a personal guarantee when involved in a business.
New Zealand Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

B&F Papers v NZPC Holdings [2018] NZHC 35

As a term of an agreement entered into between B&F Papers Limited (B&F) and NZPC Holdings Ltd (NZPC) in 2006, the defendant director, Mr McCormack, signed a personal guarantee of NZPC's debts to B&F. B&F supplied NZPC under the agreement without problem until early 2011. At this point NZPC started to fall behind on its payments. A payment plan for delayed payment was agreed in February 2013. Mr McCormack subsequently resigned as a director of NZPC in March 2013.

Following a pattern of sporadic payments, B&F lost patience with NZPC and in 2015 commenced proceedings against Mr McCormack to recover the outstanding amount by virtue of his personal guarantee. The High Court found that Mr McCormack was liable under the personal guarantee.

The High Court did not accept Mr McCormack's argument that B&F had released him from his guarantee by way of a discussion had between him and a representative of B&F shortly after he resigned his directorship. Rather, the Judge considered that Mr McCormack had convinced himself, at the time or subsequently, that the words used in that conversation meant he was released from ongoing liability. The Court also rejected Mr McCormack's contention that the payment plan had materially varied the principal contract so as to render the guarantee ineffective, and that additional payments made by NZPC under other agreements should be applied as against the guarantee.

As the Court itself noted, the takeaway point is that care needs to be taken in providing a personal guarantee when involved in a business. It can be difficult to escape personal liability under such a guarantee, even when no longer involved in the business.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More