Introduction

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal (CofA) in Lee v Revenue Commissioners1 clarifies the principles that are applicable in determining the jurisdictional scope of the Tax Appeals Commission (TAC). Although the jurisdiction of the TAC's predecessor, the Appeal Commissioners (ACs), was at issue in this case, the principles promulgated by the CofA are relevant to the TAC's jurisdiction.

Overview of the TAC

The TAC was established in 2016 pursuant to s3 of the Finance (Tax Appeals) Act 2015 ("the 2015 Act") to replace the Office of the ACs as the independent statutory body responsible for the administration and determination of tax appeals. The TAC's functions are broadly stipulated in s6 of the 2015 Act as including:

"doing all such other things as they consider conducive to the resolution of disputes between appellants and the Revenue Commissioners and the establishment of the correct liability to tax of appellants [emphasis added]".

The TAC's procedural autonomy is reflected in Part 40A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (TCA 1997), which prescribes the appeals process.2 In addition to determining the validity of an appeal and the steps to be taken by the parties to resolve the dispute, the TAC is entitled to determine an appeal without a hearing where appropriate.3

The Decision

Overview

In Lee v Revenue Commissioners the taxpayer claimed that Revenue had accepted a payment he made as settlement of a tax liability and was bound by the agreement. The case concerned whether the ACs had jurisdiction to determine whether a contract had been concluded between the taxpayer and Revenue in the circumstances. The High Court held that the ACs had such jurisdiction, emphasising the elaborate procedures enacted by the Oireachtas for determining a taxpayer's liability and the need to avoid an artificially narrow construction of the powers and authority conferred on the ACs.

Almost exactly three years from the date of the High Court decision the CofA delivered its judgment, on 28 January 2021. At the very outset, the CofA framed the appeal as presenting a "net issue as to the scope of the jurisdiction of the Appeal Commissioners...when hearing appeals against assessments to income tax". Ultimately, the CofA overturned the High Court's decision, concluding that the ACs' jurisdiction extended to determining whether an assessment properly reflects the statutory charge to tax, having regard to the relevant provisions of the taxing Act and any incidental questions of fact and law. The CofA held that the ACs' jurisdiction did not extend to findings otherwise relevant to dealings between taxpayers and Revenue and, therefore, that the ACs were not entitled to adjudicate on whether a liability to tax had been contractually settled.

Jurisdiction mapped by statute

The CofA applied the well-established "trite and historical principle of law that a creature of statute must live by the statute",4 highlighting that the ACs' functions are limited to those expressly conferred by the TCA and that the ACs do not otherwise enjoy any inherent or general jurisdiction.

In light of the foregoing, the CofA proceeded to analyse carefully the provisions of Part 40 of TCA 19975 to determine the scope of the ACs' jurisdiction. The CofA noted the following four key features in this context:

  • the definition of the appellate jurisdiction of the ACs,
  • the parameters of the permissible grounds of appeal,
  • the orders that the ACs may make and
  • the powers conferred on the ACs to enable the appeal to be heard.

The CofA concluded that the statutory scheme prescribed by TCA 1997 limited the ACs' jurisdiction to determining whether Revenue had correctly reflected the statutory charge to tax in the relevant assessment in accordance with the applicable charging provision and in light of the relevant facts and law.

Read the full article here.

Footnotes

1. [2021] IECA 18.

2. Part 40A of TCA 1997 replaced Part 40, which dealt with appeals to the ACs before the introduction of the TAC by the Finance (Tax Appeals) Act 2015.

3. In 2020 59% of the TAC's determinations were issued without a hearing.

4. County Louth Vocational Educational Committee: (now known as Louth and Meath Education and Training Board) v The Equality Tribunal [2016] IESC 40 at 35.

5. As noted, Part 40 of TCA 1997 prescribed the appeals process under the AC system before the introduction of the TAC by the Finance (Tax Appeals) Act 2015. Part 40 was replaced by Part 40A for appeals under the TAC system.

Originally published by Irish Tax Review, June 2021.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.