Unpaid Installment Under Settlement Agreement Cannot Trigger Insolvency

LO
LexCounsel Law Offices

Contributor

“LexCounsel is a corporate and commercial law firm with head office at New Delhi and associate offices in major cities across India. Supported by the strong capabilities and experience of its members, it provides comprehensive legal services to a broad spectrum of corporations in the areas of Corporate & M&A, Private Equity & Funding, Education, Biotechnology, Satellite/Space Law, Food & Health, TMT, Aviation and Defence, Projects & Energy, Restructuring and Insolvency, Dispute Resolution, Real Estate, Taxation, Intellectual Property, Retail, Licensing & Franchising.”
The petition has been filed under Section 9 of the IBC by Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. ('OC') for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Logix Infratech Pvt. Ltd. ('CD').
India Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Case Details: Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. vs Logix Infratech Pvt. Ltd. (CP (IB) No. 882/ND/2022)
Court: The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench ('NCLT')
Ratio: A failure or breach of a settlement agreement, or failure to pay as per the settlement agreement, cannot be the grounds to trigger insolvency proceedings against the Corporate Debtor under the provisions of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Judgment date: June 3, 2022
Act/Law: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ('IBC')


Factual Matrix:

  • The petition has been filed under Section 9 of the IBC by Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. ('OC') for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Logix Infratech Pvt. Ltd. ('CD').
  • The OC is a construction company and the CD is engaged in the business of real estate development. The OC was engaged by the CD to develop a group housing project namely, 'Blossom Greens' situated at Sector 143, Noida ('Project').
  • Out of the total amount of work done by the OC for the CD under their contracts, an amount of Rs. 10.11 crores were verified and remained unpaid by the CD to the OC and an amount of Rs 4.02 crores were unverified and unresolved between the parties thereto. Thereafter, the parties arrived at a settlement for a lumpsum amount of Rs. 11 crores payable by the CD to the OC, wherein few flats/inventories were given to the OC worth Rs. 3.28 crores. A settlement agreement dated September 30, 2019 ("Agreement") was accordingly executed between the parties.
  • Vide letter dated October 14, 2019, the OC reminded the CD to make payment of the first installment by October 25, 2019. An email dated October 26, 2019 was sent to the CD by the OC apprising the CD of his failure to pay first installment of the settlement amount and requested the CD to make immediate payment. The OC issued another reminder letter dated November 5, 2019 to the CD to adhere to the settlement agreement. Thereafter, vide the email dated November 15, 2019, CD admitted to its failure to honor the Agreement and further blamed the non-payment of first installment on economic slowdown and the overall bad shape of the real estate market. Thereafter, the OC sent several reminders to the CD for payment of the unpaid installments under the Agreement.
  • Thereafter, the OC under Section 8 of the IBC issued a Demand Notice dated February 15, 2020 upon the CD, demanding payment of the unpaid settlement amount of Rs. 7.72 crores. Subsequently, the OC filed an insolvency petition under the IBC before the NCLT for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the CD.

Upon consideration, the NCLT pronounced its judgment on June 3, 2022, dismissing the IBC petition filed by the OC against the CD with the Ratio as stated above. The NCLT observed that "operational debt" means "a claim in respect of provision of goods or services ......." and a default in payment of the installment as per the settlement agreement was held to not come under the definition of operational debt.

LexCounsel provides this e-update on a complimentary basis solely for informational purposes. It is not intended to constitute, and should not be taken as, legal advice, or a communication intended to solicit or establish any attorney-client relationship between LexCounsel and the reader(s). LexCounsel shall not have any obligations or liabilities towards any acts or omission of any reader(s) consequent to any information contained in this e-newsletter. The readers are advised to consult competent professionals in their own judgment before acting on the basis of any information provided hereby.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More