ARTICLE
24 September 2024

JSA Successfully Advised And Represented Tata Communications Limited In Defending An Award In Its Favour Before The High Court Of Delhi

J
JSA

Contributor

JSA Advocates and Solicitors is a top-tier, full-service Indian law firm. Established in 1991, at the start of India’s economic liberalisation, the firm has built a strong reputation for handling complex and high-stakes legal and commercial matters. The firm is organised around specialist practice areas and industry sectors. It works closely with leading Indian corporates, Fortune 500 companies, global financial institutions, and government and statutory bodies on important corporate, financing, and disputes mandates. JSA has a team of over 700 legal professionals, including 180+ partners, and operates from 10 offices across seven cities in India: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Gurugram, Hyderabad, Mumbai, and New Delhi. The firm is consistently recognised as a top-tier practice by leading international legal directories, including Chambers & Partners (Asia-Pacific and Global), Legal 500, and AsiaLaw.
The Delhi High Court, in a decisive and swift ruling, dismissed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Union of India, at the very first hearing...
India Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Delhi High Court, in a decisive and swift ruling, dismissed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Union of India, at the very first hearing. The High Court emphatically remarked that the Union of India should never have approached the court with such a meritless challenge. The High Court also directed that the judgment be placed before the Secretary, Ministry of Woman and Child Development, and the Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Government of India, for necessary administrative directions.

The High Court, while dismissing the petition, held that there was no absurdity and arbitrariness in the conclusions arrived at by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator, which are sine quo non for interference under Section 34 of the Act.

Our Disputes Team Comprised Partner – Padmaja Kaul, Principal Associate – Yugank Goel and Associate – Vansh Bhutani.

Originally published 21 August 2024

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More