ARTICLE
11 January 2023

SC Rules That Arbitrators Cannot Unilaterally Fix Fee As It Violates Party Autonomy

AP
AZB & Partners

Contributor

AZB & Partners is one of India's premier law firms with 500+ lawyers and offices across the country. The firm was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to provide reliable, practical and full–service advice to clients, across all sectors. Having grown steadily since its inception, AZB & Partners now has offices across Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Pune and Chennai. We are recognized by most international publications for our legal expertise.
The SC in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd NGC v. Afcons Gunanusa JV[1] has held that arbitrators do not have the power to unilaterally issue binding orders...
India Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The SC in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd NGC v. Afcons Gunanusa JV1 has held that arbitrators do not have the power to unilaterally issue binding orders determining their own fees since this inter alia violates the principle of party autonomy. The Court clarified that the arbitral tribunal has the discretion to apportion the costs (including arbitrators' fees and expenses) between the parties and demand a deposit (advance on costs). If while fixing costs or deposits, the arbitral tribunal makes any finding relating to arbitrators' fees (in the absence of an agreement between the parties and arbitrators), it cannot be enforced in favour of the arbitrators.

Footnote

1. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd NGC v. Afcons Gunanusa JV, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1122.

Originally published 30 September, 2022

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More