The Hong Kong Monetary Authority ("HKMA") released a research report last week showing evidence that about one-third of global corporate green bond issuers are reaping the benefits of issuing green bonds without cutting down their greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. This type of 'greenwashing' behaviour impedes progress on combating climate change and could lead to financial instability if the market loses confidence in green bonds and other green asset classes. Not all is grim, however, as the HKMA has identified positive trends and ways to mitigate the damage. The HKMA report also confirmed that corporate green bonds, if taken seriously by issuers, could help tackle climate change.
Not as eco-friendly as you think
The purpose of issuing a green bond is to generate proceeds that are committed to funding assets or projects that bring positive environmental benefits, one of which is reducing GHG emissions and fostering a low-carbon economy.
Based on a set of sample data reviewed by the HKMA, around 40% of corporate issuers unfortunately showed a higher level of GHG emissions after they issued their initial green bond. While the rest of the issuers did show a reduction in levels of GHG emissions, the magnitude of that decrease was relatively small. This is strong evidence, in the HKMA's view, that greenwashing is not uncommon amongst players in the green bond market.
The path to self-correction
Interestingly, the HKMA report explains that the market has its own way of penalising greenwashing behaviour. Investors become less willing to invest in green bonds that are revealed as greenwashing, which in turn stifles demand and pushes up costs of issuance, dis-incentivising those greenwashing firms from issuing green bonds again. Empirical evidence shows that greenwashing firms have a lower probability of repeated issuance of green bonds.
Mitigation through mandatory disclosure requirements and taxonomies
The HKMA report further observed that green bond taxonomies (i.e. identification of assets and projects needed to deliver a low-carbon economy which pass the GHG emissions screening criteria set by the COP21 Paris Agreement) and enhanced environmental disclosure requirements are effective in mitigating greenwashing risks. The likelihood of greenwashing bonds being issued by firms with comprehensive disclosure requirements on environmental performance is about 21% lower than those without such requirements.
The HKMA's conclusions are based on its analysis of data on 1,888 corporate green bonds with total issuance size of around US$591.14 billion issued by 643 listed companies between 2013 and 2021. Information on the data selection and methodology applied can be found in the HKMA's report.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.