After three months of remote work, some employers are moving towards making such arrangements permanent.  While this might provide considerable savings with respect to real estate, employers should be aware that they may be required to pay certain remote work costs.

The general rule is that employers cannot make employees pay for an employer's business expenses-even if the employee agrees to it.  This includes a prohibition on withholding wages for any cost of doing business.

To determine whether something is a business expense, it is necessary to consider who benefits from the expense and the purpose of it.

To be clear, an employer must make deductions for income tax, Employment Insurance premiums and Canada Pension Plan contributions.  Further, an employee can agree, in writing, to deductions of wages for medical premiums, the repayment of payroll advances or purchases made from an employer, and accidental overpayments.  However, business expenses are a no go.

Examples of business costs which we know employers are prohibited from passing on to employees are gas for delivery work and cell phone use for business purposes.  However, employees cannot require an employer to pay for part of the employee's rent, where the employee is working from home (unless, of course, the employer agrees to do so).  Such a notional allocation is not considered a business expense.

What is less clear-in light of the rise of employers no longer maintaining workplaces-is who is responsible for the costs associated with things like wifi; computers and other electronics (including repairs); stationery and other office supplies; and office furniture.  If the expenses are paid only for work reasons, for something that an employee needs to do their job, it is likely they are business expenses.  If the employee would have incurred the expense regardless of their job, it is less probable an employer will be required to pay.  It may be that employers will have to cover portions of their employees' bills for things that the employer declines to, or cannot, provide to the employee themselves.

If an employee makes a successful complaint to the Employment Standards Branch regarding business expenses, the employer would be required to repay the employee for the monies it withheld or that the employee paid out, plus interest.  The Employment Standards Branch could also impose penalties and/or fines on the employer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Andrea Raso
Clark Wilson LLP
Anne Amos-Stewart
Clark Wilson LLP
Catherine Repel
Clark Wilson LLP
Debbie Preston
Clark Wilson LLP
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Employment and HR from Canada
Employers: The Time To Revisit Your Employment Contracts Is Now!: An Update On Waksdale And Its Impact On Termination Clauses
Robins Appleby LLP
Based on some recent cases, it is strongly recommended that employers have experienced employment lawyers review, at this time, their existing employment
Court Of Appeal Finds University Discriminated Against Disabled Student
Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP
In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal for Ontario found that the University of Waterloo (the "University") discriminated against a student applicant on the basis of disability in its decision...
Ontario Court Sets Sky High Bar For Job Abandonment
Although uncommon, from time to time employers may find themselves dealing with job abandonment. As the very recent decision of Hettrick v Triple F Paving illustrates, however, it is crucial to...
Continued Consideration Of COVID-19's Impact On Reasonable Notice Analysis
Torys LLP
On February 9, 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision in Iriotakis v. Peninsula Employment Services Limited.
B.C. Human Rights Tribunal Makes Record-Shattering Award For Injury To Dignity
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
On January 28, 2021, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal (the "Tribunal") ordered the Government of British Columbia to pay a total of $974,167 – including a record-shattering $176,000 on compensation...
Discrimination And Retaliation: Employee Terminated After Complaining About Inappropriate Comments On Her Appearance
In The Sales Associate v. Aurora Biomed Inc. and others, 2021 BCHRT 5 the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ruled in favour of a Complainant...