ARTICLE
3 February 2025

PGFN/MF Ordinance No 95/2025: Request For Dismissal Of Tax Guarantee Decided By Cast CARF Vote

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On January 20, 2025, the PGFN/MF Ordinance No. 95/2025 (the "Ordinance") was published in the Federal Official Gazette, regulating the dismissal of debt guarantees...
Brazil Tax

On January 20, 2025, the PGFN/MF Ordinance No. 95/2025 (the "Ordinance") was published in the Federal Official Gazette, regulating the dismissal of debt guarantees arising from a cast vote of the Federal Government at the Taxpayers Council of Administrative Appeals ("CARF"), provided that taxpayer´s ability to pay is duly recognized by the Attorney-General of the National Treasury ("PGFN").

Article 3, Item I of the Ordinance allows a taxpayer to offer the proof of its tax compliance as a guarantee, with the option to present other guarantees, as long the preference order of Article 11 of Law No. 6,830/1980 ("LEF") is respected.

The application must be submitted through the REGULARIZE system , along with: (i) the list of the outstanding debts to be guaranteed; (ii) an independent auditor's report on the corporate entity's financial statements; (iii) a list of free assets and documentation proving their ownership and valuation; (iv) a commitment to inform PGFN of the sale, disposal or encumbrance of the indicated assets and its substitution; (v) a commitment to settle, within 90 days, the debts enrolled into overdue tax liability, or due after the application.

Once the application has been received, an administrative proceeding will be opened to confirm the authenticity of the documentation and information submitted by the taxpayer, including if the taxpayer had a valid tax clearance certificate for at least nine of the prior 12 months from when the lawsuit was filed. In the event of any inconsistencies or errors, the taxpayer will be notified that they must rectify these issues within 10 days.

The National Treasury may revoke the compliance if:

  • The taxpayer does not have federal tax clearance certificate for more than 90 days;
  • The taxpayer doesn't report the sale, disposal, encumbrance, depreciation, or expiration of the assets indicated for the recognition of tax compliance, and doesn't offer another free-and-clear asset as a substitute;
  • The lawsuit is found in favor to the National Treasury;
  • The National Treasury rejects the assets indicated to replace those initially listed; or
  • Divergences are verified in the registration, asset, or economic-fiscal information provided by the taxpayer, which compromise the certification of its ability to pay.

In any of these scenarios, the taxpayer will have 10 days to rectify any issue identified or to file an appeal. Once the recognition of tax compliance is revoked, standard debt collection procedures will resume, which may include normal enforcement actions.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2025. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More