Space travel - a tax deduction for Cirque de Soleil?

M
Madgwicks

Contributor

Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
This case highlights the importance of being aware of the primary purpose of the company or not-for-profit organisation.
Australia Corporate/Commercial Law

A recent case from Canada1 has highlighted the importance of always having in mind the primary purpose of the company or not-for-profit organisation when making decisions on its behalf.

Facts

Although the case is Canadian, it is nevertheless interesting. Its facts are as follows:

  • Guy Laliberte is the founder of Cirque de Soleil.
  • In 2009 he engaged a private space travel firm to take him on a 12 day trip to the International Space Station.
  • The trip was paid for by a company in the Cirque de Soleil corporate group. It cost almost $42 million!
  • Whilst he was in the space station he recited poetry, took photos, and filmed for a documentary and held a charity livestream, all intending to promote and support a charity, the Onedrop Foundation (founded by Laliberte and associated with Cirque de Soleil).

Was it a business expense?

No – the Court held that it was overwhelmingly a personal trip and not a business expense. The Court only allowed a small deduction on behalf of the business.

Lesson

Although most people involved in a company or not-for-profit organisation are unlikely to be making decisions as to space travel, it is always important to keep in mind when making decisions – is it in the best interest of the company or organisation?

In this case, the answer was that it was fulfilling a long held personal dream of a shareholder of the company.

Foonote

1 Laliberte v Canada 2020 FCA 97

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More