CONTRIBUTOR
ARTICLE
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Limitations and time bars abound in construction arrangements. The application of the 'ultimate limitation period' of ten years has recently expanded, but a lot of work done before 1 August 2008 will still slip through the cracks.

Contractor claims are often expressly barred unless they are made within a specified period and defects must be notified within 3, 6 or 12‑months, depending on the contract. The Home Building Act 1989 requires builders to give statutory warranties for seven years, but limits home warranty insurance indemnity to two years for non‑structural and six years for structural issues. The Limitations Act 1969 bars claims six years after the 'cause of action accrues'.

Despite the raft of bars and limitations, claims relating to building issues, brought many years after the structure is occupied, remain common place.

Building claims based on breach of a duty of care are subject to a six year limitation period, but the six year period does not commence to run until the defect becomes apparent (unless expressly prohibited under the contract). A fundamental defect may take years or even decades to reveal itself.

Section 109ZK of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act attempted to manage this long tail of construction liability by barring claims made more than 10 years after the date on which the final occupation certificate was issued. The difficulty is that history has recorded many instances where an occupation certificate has never been issued. If there is no occupation certificate, there is no 10 year 'ultimate limitation period'.

On 1 August 2008, s109ZK was amended to provide that where no occupation certificate has been issued, a building action may not be brought more than 10 years after:

  • the last date the building work was inspected by a certifying authority; or
  • if no such inspection has been conducted, the date on which that part of the building, where the building work was carried out, is first occupied or used.

The change to the application of the 'ultimate limitation period' was made to ensure that the period during which an action for loss or damage may be brought in relation to defective building work is consistent with the period for which accredited certifiers are required to be covered by insurance under the Building Professionals Act 2005.

For reasons apparently only known to the New South Wales Government, the change does not apply to building work commenced before 1 August 2008. If the building work was commenced before that date and there is no occupation certificate issued, there will be no 'ultimate limitation period' and exposure to potential claims can, in theory, last for forever.

Sydney

   

Robert Riddell

t (02) 9931 4940

e rriddell@nsw.gadens.com.au

Scott Laycock

t (02) 9931 4865

e slaycock@nsw.gadens.com.au

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from Australia
Settlement Agreements: Top 10 Tips
Bartier Perry
When parties settle a dispute, the agreement should be recorded so that rights and obligations are clear and enforceable.
Have you breached the Harman Undertaking? Pardon?
Bartier Perry
Only a court can release a party from its Harman undertaking, so a breach of the obligation can be contempt of court.
Can a dying declaration be admitted in evidence?
Stacks Law Firm
Some Australian judges have ruled that a dying declaration could not be admitted if the person did not believe in God.
Judge determines law to be illogical, unreasonable and inconsistent in dust disease claim by stonemason
Hall Payne Lawyers
The express wording of the Act did not allow a claimant with secondary injuries to expedite a resolution of their claim.
Concerns Notice – The first step in formally commencing a defamation claim
Rostron Carlyle Rojas
A Concerns Notice in NSW allows the publisher an opportunity to make amends without the need for legal proceedings.
Merger of the Federal Circuit Court and Family Court
Mellor Olsson Lawyers
Many people will be pleased with the single point of entry, with combined rules and forms to simplify case management.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media