A recent case in the Federal Court of Australia1 demonstrates how a not-for-profit (NFP) organisation can get caught up in a social media defamation claim.
- Zoe Support assists disadvantaged and welfare–dependant young mothers in Mildura, providing pathways to education, training and employment. Zoe Support brought the proceedings.
- Dr Anne Webster (the founder of Zoe Support) and Dr Philip Webster (her husband) also brought the proceedings.
- Ms Brewer who made video posts over a two week period.
The video posts
The video posts (shared on social media) alleged that the Websters and Zoe Support was part of a secretive criminal network involved in the sexual abuse of children.
The Court's finding
There was absolutely no basis for the claims in the video posts and that the claims were the most serious kind of defamation which could be levelled at an individual or a charity.
The Court ordered the following damages:
- $350,000 to Dr Anne Webster
- $225,000 to Dr Philip Webster
- $300,000 to Zoe Support
This case demonstrates that the Court is willing, in the right circumstances, to order damages in favour of a NFP defamed on social media.
1 Weber v Brewer (no 3)  FCA 1343
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.