22 December 2021

Update on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for staff



Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
Employers can mandate COVID vaccinations for staff – pursuant to implied term to obey lawful & reasonable directions of employer.
Australia Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

In a significant decision, the Full Bench of the Full Fair Work Commission has determined that an employer has the power to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for staff where it is acting pursuant to the implied term of all contacts of employment requiring employees to obey the lawful and reasonable directions of the employer. This applies even when there are no public health orders or terms in an enterprise agreement or employment contracts that would provide the legal basis to mandate COVID vaccination. See further CFMMEU v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Ltd [2021] FWCFB 6059.

Whether a particular direction is reasonable is not to be determined in a vacuum but requires a consideration of all the circumstances including:

  • the nature of the particular employment;
  • the established usages affecting the employment;
  • the common practices that exist; and
  • the general provisions of any legislation or enterprise agreement governing the relationship including applicable workplace safety legislation.

The assessment of reasonableness and proportionality is essentially one of fact and balance. This needs to be assessed on a case by case basis. The assessment will include, but not be determined by, where there is a logic or understandable basis for the direction.

However, the employer in this case, BHP, failed because it was held that due to a lack of consultation with its employees and the union, the requirement to be vaccinated prior to coming on site was not reasonable. The consultation requirements under the applicable New South Wales workplace safety laws were specific in relation to their consultation requirements and required the employees to have a meaningful input or influence prior to the implementation of BHP's decision to mandate COVID vaccination for employees entering any BHP site.

Key Point for Employers

Employers implementing mandatory COVID vaccination prior to employees returning to work are advised to carefully consider any applicable consultation requirements in relation to health and safety measures and seek further advice to avoid a challenge and setting aside of a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More