ARTICLE
28 February 2023

Stanley v DPP [2023] HCA 3 and intensive correction orders – What it means for those facing jail.

OC
O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors

Contributor

O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors defend people against criminal charges anywhere in Australia, as well as litigating defamation cases, and suing police and other authorities for unlawful conduct. We are a strong advocate for social justice issues and pride ourselves on our pro-bono practice. We are a growing and dynamic law firm that occasionally has vacancies for people seeking legal careers or administrative opportunities.
Recent case is relevant for those looking to avoid full-time jail & instead receive an intensive correction order.
Australia Criminal Law

This week the High Court of Australia (HCA) handed down a favourable judgement in Stanley v DPP (Stanley). This is relevant for those looking to avoid full-time imprisonment (jail) and instead receive an intensive correction order (ICO).

1287208a.jpg

What is the difference between an intensive correction order and jail?

Both jail and ICOs are forms of "imprisonment".

ICOs have replaced suspended sentences and home detention pursuant to Section 7(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) (SPA). Section 7(1) states:

A court that has sentenced an offender to imprisonment in respect of 1 or more offences may make an intensive correction order directing that the sentence or sentences be served by way of intensive correction in the community.

Community safety must be of "paramount consideration" when the sentencing court is deciding whether to make an ICO in relation to an offender.

Further, s.66(2) of the SPA provides that, when considering community safety, the court is to assess whether making the ICO or serving the sentence in jail is more likely to address the offender's risk of reoffending.

In layperson's terms, before the HCA judgment of Stanley this week, sentencing courts did not have to consider ICOs when it determined that the offender would receive a term of "imprisonment".

Sentencing courts must now consider ICOs

Now, however, a sentencing court must consider both options of jail or ICOs when sentencing an offender to "imprisonment". In effect, the sentencing court must now make a subsequent and separate decision once it determines that the offender will receive "imprisonment".

This leaves scope for defence lawyers to now argue that their client's sentence be an ICO instead of jail.

1287208b.jpg

If you or someone you know are potentially going to receive a jail sentence, contact O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors to find out your legal options.

Our lawyers have the experience and knowledge to guide you through the legal process.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More