ARTICLE
12 April 2019

Lost in space: trade mark application for ISU INTERNATIONAL SPACE UNIVERSITY

SF
Spruson & Ferguson

Contributor

Established in 1887, Spruson & Ferguson is a leading intellectual property (IP) service provider in the Asia-Pacific region, with offices in Australia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. They offer high-quality services to clients and are part of the IPH Limited group, which includes various professional service firms operating under different brands in multiple jurisdictions. Spruson & Ferguson is an incorporated entity owned by IPH Limited, with a strong presence in the industry.
The trademark, for use with printed materials, educational services, and scientific services, was refused registration.
Australia Intellectual Property

International Space University - (ISU) (Association de droit local) [2018] ATMO 198

This matter concerned an application by the "International Space University" - (ISU) (Association de droit local) to register the trade mark ISU INTERNATIONAL SPACE UNIVERSITY in Australia in connection with printed materials, educational services, and scientific services.

During initial examination, the trade mark was objected to by the Australian Trade Marks Office on the basis that the trade mark indicated that the goods and services covered thereunder related to the study of space and were carried out in an international university.

The applicant requested a hearing on the objection and at the hearing, argued that whilst the individual elements of its trade mark may have descriptive meaning, the overall trade mark did not.

The Hearing Officer noted the arguments, but was not persuaded to agree. Instead, the Hearing Officer noted his view that the ‘ISU’ element of the overall trade mark would be readily identified as ‘International Space University’ (citing ANU and UNSW as examples) and that the ordinary signification of ‘International Space University’ was directly descriptive.

Finally, the applicant sought to rely on evidence of use to overcome the objection, but that evidence amounted to some 30-45 students in Australia over a five year period, which the Hearing Officer considered to be ‘very limited use’ of the trade mark in Australia.

The application is to be refused registration.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More