A historic decision by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") has caused a seismic shift in the European football landscape. This decision, which tackles the divisive topic of the European Super League, has broad ramifications for how football leagues are run and how European Union ("EU") competition legislation is implemented. This article explores the nuances of the decision, its ramifications, and the prospects for European football tournaments.

Context and Landmark Ruling

The European Super League was first conceived in 2021 with the intention of creating a breakaway league with some of Europe's best clubs. The founding clubs included the Spanish giants Real Madrid and Barcelona, as well as the most successful Italian football club, Juventus. Widespread opposition led to the plan's swift failure. However, the underlying legal struggle went on, and the ECJ made a landmark ruling in the end.

The Grand Chamber of the ECJ ruled that FIFA and UEFA's regulations requiring prior approval for interclub competitions like the Super League were contrary to EU law. These regulations were deemed to violate competition law and the freedom to provide services. The Court emphasised that FIFA and UEFA's regulations lacked a clear, impartial, non-discriminatory, and reasonable structure.

The ruling has the following implications:

  • Legal precedence: By contesting FIFA and UEFA's monopolistic control over football competitions, this case creates a precedence for the law.
  • Club Autonomy: Without worrying about repercussions, clubs can now experiment with novel tournament structures.
  • Market Dynamics: The decision may spur more innovation and competitiveness in football leagues, which might be advantageous to viewers and media outlets alike.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: FIFA and UEFA may need to make revisions to their competition approval procedures and governance frameworks.

The European Super League's Revival

Following its creation, the league, supported by A22, declared its plan to bring the initiative back with a new structure. With no permanent members and an open competition based on athletic ability, this updated format might include up to 80 teams in a multi-divisional system.

Difficulties and Uncertainties

Nevertheless, a number of difficulties persist in spite of the decision:

  • Implementation: It's yet unclear how the decision will actually be used to organise new tournaments.
  • Club Participation: There is still uncertainty around the positions of large clubs, particularly those in the Premier League.
  • Regulatory Reaction: It is unclear how national leagues, FIFA, and UEFA will react to this development.


The decision rendered by the ECJ represents a turning point in the management of football leagues. It also heralds in a time of uncertainty and perhaps a much-needed reform in the realm of football governance, even as it makes way for fresh and maybe thrilling football competitions. As stakeholders in the football scene adjust to this new legal and competitive environment, a watchful eye will be kept on the future of the European Super League and other such competitions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.