India: IBC Barred By Limitation Or Not?

Last Updated: 3 December 2018
Practice Guide by Dhir & Dhir Associates

Authored by Varsha Banerjee, Partner and Pragya Khaitan, Principal Associate

The aspect of applicability of the Limitation Act, 1963 (Limitation Act) to the proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been a subject matter of various proceedings under IBC. The Limitation Act was enacted with the object of consolidating and amending the law for the limitation of suits and other proceedings.

The law has been fine-tuned and developed on the basis of various judgments which interpreted it across multiple statutes.

The applicability of the Limitation Act for initiating recovery proceedings has undergone several amendments. The aspect of applicability of the law of limitation also arises in proceedings under IBC.

Any new development, as introduced by any new enactment, requires time as the same is to be interpreted, analyzed and implemented . The coming into force of IBC has resulted in remarkable changes that have had an impact on the existing legal framework. The applicability of the Limitation Act to IBC was a lacuna that needed cognizance by the judiciary to avoid any obstacles in the smooth functioning of the Code.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), in an attempt to plug the gap, passed a common order in the matters of Speculum Plast Private Limited v PTC Techno Private Limited, Parag Gupta & Associates v BK Educational Services Private Limited and Ashlay Infrastructure Private Limited v LDS Engineers Private Limited.

The NCLAT held that IBC is a comprehensive code and is independent of the application of other laws as is evident from the observations in the matter of Innoventive Industries Limited vs. ICICI Bank & Anr. The NCLAT held that even in the absence of an explicit provision excluding the applicability of Limitation Act in proceedings under IBC, it is open for the courts to scrutinize the provisions of IBC to conclude whether the Limitation Act is excluded. The NCLAT also held that several sections of IBC provide timelines for the various stages of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), which are not the same as the timelines prescribed under the code by virtue of Section 255 read with the Eleventh Schedule. Further, it was held that the Limitation Act cannot be made applicable in an application for insolvency by a corporate debtor under Section 10 of the Code, as such applications do not carry specific claim or debt, the same being voluntary. Another interesting observation made by the NCLAT was that Article 137 of Part II of the Limitation Act prescribes a limitation period of 3 years from the date that the right to apply accrues.

The NCLAT gave the Adjudicating Authority under the Code, absolute authority to decide whether or not a claim is belated and/or barred by limitation. The NCLAT ruling would have resulted in increased number of insolvency applications as well as the appeals against them, which is why Section 238A was inserted vide the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018 which came into effect from June 06, 2018. Section 238A of the IBC clearly stated that the provisions of the Limitation Act would apply to the proceedings or appeals before the NCLT, NCLAT, DRT and DRAT.

However, even with coming into force of the Amendment Act, the aspect of whether the application of the Limitation Act to IBC would be prospective or retrospective, that is to say whether the applicability of the Limitation Act to IBC would be from 01.12.2016 or not continued to remain a grey area.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgement in the matter of B.K. Educational Services Private Limited vs. Parag Gupta and Associates addressed the intricacies involved qua the applicability of the Limitation Act and opined on the following aspects:

  • Report of the Insolvency Law Committee of March 2018

    The crux of the Insolvency Law Committee Report, March 2018 was that since the intent of the Code was not to array the Code as a fresh opportunity for creditors and claimants who did not exercise their remedy under existing laws within the prescribed limitation period, the Committee thought it fit to insert a specific section applying the Limitation Act to the Code. It is evident from the language of the report that the Code did not intend to resuscitate stale and dead claims.
  • Reading IBC with the Companies Act, 2013

    According to the combined reading of the Companies Act, 2013 with IBC, it is evident that the NCLT was meant to discharge such powers and perform such functions and duties that are conferred on it not merely by the Companies Act, 2013 but also under any other law for the time being in force.

    Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, under which all the proceedings pending, including winding up proceedings, before any High Court or District Court would stand transferred to NCLT and then NCLT may proceed with the said proceedings from the stage at which they stand transferred. The thing to be considered at this point is that the above mentioned proceedings, being proceedings before the High Court and/or District Court would definitely come under the purview of the Limitation Act. Thus, it is evident that the application of the Limitation Act would continue upon the said proceedings as it would be absurd to assume that just by virtue of being transferred to NCLT, the doctrine of limitation would cease to apply to the said proceedings. Further, it would be prejudicial to interpret the said provision to mean that the fresh filings before NCLT would be exempt from the bar imposed by the Limitation Act but the transferred proceedings cannot avail the same. Thus, in view of the aforesaid and Rule 5 of the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016, the provisions of Section 433 of the Companies Act would apply to NCLT even while deciding applications under Sections 7 and 9 of the Code.
  • Retrospective effect

    The next point of contention was that Section 238A being procedural in nature and providing a clarification of law, must be retrospective in its application. The Supreme Court relied upon the judgement of Thirumalai Chemicals Limited vs. Union of India to arrive at the conclusion that limitation being procedural in nature would ordinarily be applied retrospectively, save and except the fact that any amendment to the existing law and/or a new law cannot revive a dead remedy.

    The Supreme Court also relied upon the judgement of Allied Motors (P) limited vs. CIT to arrive at the conclusion that it is clear that the insertion of Section 238A would not serve its object unless it is construed as being retrospective, as otherwise, applications seeking to resurrect time barred claims would have to be allowed, not being governed by the law of limitation.
  • Sections 60 & 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

    The Apex court also made a reference to Sections 60 and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, which led to the conclusion that limitation merely bars the remedy and not the right. It is noteworthy that Section 60 uses the phrase "......actually due and payable to him....."whether its recovery is or is not barred by the limitation law. It is pertinent to note that the word "actually" makes it clear that in fact a debt must be due and payable notwithstanding the law of limitation. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the same that in the context of Contract Act, the expression "due and payable" by itself would connote an amount that may be due even though it is time barred, for otherwise, it would be unnecessary for Section 60 to contain the word "actually" together with the words "whether its recovery is or is not barred by the law for the time being as to the limitation of suits".
  • Intent of the Legislature

    The Supreme Court also relied upon the judgement of Andhra Pradesh Power Coordination Committee & Ors. vs. Lanco Kondapalli Power Limited & Ors. to conclude that the legislature did not contemplate enabling a creditor who has allowed the period of limitation to set in and allow such delayed claims through the mechanism of the Code. The Code cannot be triggered in the year 2017 for a debt which was time barred much earlier, as that would lead to the absurd and extreme consequence of the Code being triggered by a stale or dead claim, leading to the drastic consequence of instantly removing of the present Board of Directors of the corporate debtor permanently, which may ultimately lead to liquidation. This being the case, the expression "debt due" defined inthe Code would obviously refer to the debts that are "due and payable" in law, i.e, the debts that are not time barred. This view is also illustrated in the judgement of Innoventive Industries Limited vs. ICICI Bank Limited.
  • Section 60(6) of IBC

    The Supreme Court also referred to Section 60(6) of the Code, stating that the said provision would have been wholly unnecessary if the Limitation Act was otherwise excluded either by reason of the Code being complete in itself or by virtue of Section 238 of the Code. Both Sections 238A of the Code as well as Section 433 of the Companies Act, 2013 would apply the provisions of the Limitation Act as far as may be.


It is clear that the provisions of the Limitation Act will be applicable to IBC, including the applications filed under Section 7 and 9. It will have retrospective effect from 01.12. 2016. Thus, it is safe to conclude that if the creditor attempts to file an application in lieu of a debt, wherein the default had occurred three years prior to the date of filing, the said application would attract the provisions of Article 137 of the Limitation Act and thus be barred. The only exception would be where Section 5 of the Limitation Act may be applied to condone the delay, due to appropriate reasons.

The present Supreme Court ruling succeeds in curbing situations where, due to the nonexistence of a fixed formula for assessing limitation, the forum of NCLT and NCLAT were used as a pressure tactic by the lenders. Further, in light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the situation wherein the lenders sought remedy of time barred claim is also avoided in as much as debts which are now barred by law of limitation cannot now be relied upon to initiate proceedings under IBC. The idea behind the applicability of the Limitation Act to most statutes is to ensure that age old debts that have already been laid to rest are not revived after its time has lapsed. This principle also functions on the adage that one cannot benefit from one's own wrong. It is to be understood that in the event that a creditor has not acted upon the recovery of a debt for an extended period of time, then the said creditor is barred from doing the same and ensure that the creditor does not try to buttress the amount of interest that would have built up over the years. Thus, the Hon'ble Supreme Court through its judgment has plugged the lacuna under IBC and brought IBC in line with the law of limitation.

This article is for information purpose only. It is not intended to constitute, and should not be taken as legal advice, or a communication intended to solicit or establish commercial motives with any. The firm shall not have any obligations or liabilities towards any acts or omission of any reader(s) consequent to any information contained herein. The readers are advised to consult competent professionals in their own judgment before acting on the basis of any information provided hereby.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Contact the Author?
Click here to email the Author
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Other India Advice Centres
Arbitration, Litigation and Conciliation
More Advice Centers
Significant Recent Cases
Highlights of commercially relevant recent news and events.
Recent judgments and court decisions of interest.
Upcoming Events
Media from our most recent events and conferences.
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions