PRESS RELEASE
29 November 2022

Jurisdictional Differences In Real Estate Security And Enforcement

BJ
Bennett Jones LLP

Contributor

Bennett Jones is one of Canada's premier business law firms and home to 500 lawyers and business advisors. With deep experience in complex transactions and litigation matters, the firm is well equipped to advise businesses and investors with Canadian ventures, and connect Canadian businesses and investors with opportunities around the world.
David Gruber spoke at the 2022 CBA Insolvency Law Conference in Toronto. He appeared on a panel that discussed what lenders and borrowers need to consider when dealing with real estate security...
Canada

David Gruber spoke at the 2022 CBA Insolvency Law Conference in Toronto. He appeared on a panel that discussed what lenders and borrowers need to consider when dealing with real estate security, including how to value, protect and enforce.

Insolvency Insider covered the conference and posted the following summary of David's insights.

Jurisdictional Differences in Enforcement

David Gruber then covered certain differences in enforcement across Canada. David explained that these differences stem from the fact that, historically, a mortgage security took the form of an actual transfer of title, where the mortgagee became the legal and beneficial owner of the property, and the mortgagor just held an equity of redemption that was enforced in courts of chancery. In some provinces, the mortgage will include a power of sale in favour of the mortgagee, while in other provinces, this will not be enforceable as a clog on the equity of redemption.

In Ontario, while the power of sale is recognized, it is more common for mortgagees to seek a receivership order because they are worried about being found to have conducted an improvident sale. Depending on the rules of the province where the receivership is taking place, the process is different. In Ontario, the receiver is allowed to market the property for sale. In other provinces, the receiver is not able to sell or even market the property until the mortgagor's equity of redemption has expired. As a result, in some cases, lenders will opt for a consensual CCAA or NOI over a receivership so that they are able to conduct a sale process right away without the debtor holding the process up.

Contributor

Bennett Jones is one of Canada's premier business law firms and home to 500 lawyers and business advisors. With deep experience in complex transactions and litigation matters, the firm is well equipped to advise businesses and investors with Canadian ventures, and connect Canadian businesses and investors with opportunities around the world.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More