Current filters:  
Germany
IP
European Union
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns conducting pre-operating assessments more efficiently and intuitively. However, the EPO considered this non-technical. Here are the practical takeaways...
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Session 11 of the GSAS Harvard Biotech Club and Morrison & Foerster course on Legal Topics for Scientists, Entrepreneurs, and Start Ups was led by Life Sciences Transactions + Licensing partner Wolfgang Schoenig focusing on key EU Intellectual Property.
Bardehle Pagenberg
What types of inventions in database technology are patentable in Europe? The Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office will be updated on 1 March 2021 with a new section...
Germany
Bardehle Pagenberg
With its judgments of May 11, 2021, docket nos. 4b O 83/19, 4b O 23/20, and 4b 49/20, the Düsseldorf District Court follows the guidelines of the German Federal Court of Justice (FCJ)...
Mayer Brown
Kommentar zur Urteilsentscheidung des OLG Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 8.4.2021 - 2 U 42/20 (LG Düsseldorf)...
Office Freylinger
Another chocolate dispute in trademark matters is ruled by the German Federal Court.
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns notification of feed across multiple client devices where the Board reiterated that the technical effect should be a result of a "further technical consideration".
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns a European patent application relating to the translation of a human language into an abstract formal language which was considered non-technical by the EPO's Board of Appeal...
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns a European patent application relating to a method for determining comparability of service offers or products, which was considered non-technical by the EPO's
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns a European patent application for providing a user interface for controlling a system based to the body movement of the user.
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns an European patent application for a wireless device to manage cross-network telecommunication services. While the device is technical per se
Mayer Brown
In a recent decision on patent infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, the German Federal Court of Justice confirmed its case law that each limitation of the claim must be met in the...
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns the field of user interface design and the question, to which extent text-correction is a technical task.
Mayer Brown
Der Anwalt Ulrich Worm, Partner im Frankfurter Büro von Mayer Brown, bezweifelt, dass Zwangslizenzen zu mehr Dosen des Corona-Impfstoffes führen würden.
Bardehle Pagenberg
Last week, the Enlarged Board of Appeal finally published its long-awaited decision G1/19 about the patentability of computer simulations.
Bardehle Pagenberg
This is an example case which involves a mixture of technical and non-technical features. Here are the practical takeaways from the decision T 2486/16 of 12.1.2021 of Technical Board of...
Bardehle Pagenberg
Following the decision FRAND-Einwand of May 5, 2020, docket no. KZR 36/17, the German Federal Court of Justice had to deal with the dispute between Sisvel and Haier and decide on...
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision is interesting in that the distinguishing feature was found not to provide a technical contribution mainly because of the reasons for using the feature disclosed in the application.
Bardehle Pagenberg
This decision concerns the way how applications can be installed on a mobile phone's SIM, One might not expect big surprises concerning the technical character in this field, but the board...
Bardehle Pagenberg
This case is interesting for developers of online systems for selling, for example, event tickets. The basic question was whether providing a ticket sale system based on a specific queuing mechanism
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Mondaq Social Media