Current filters:  
USA
Employment Litigation/ Tribunals
United States
Pryor Cashman LLP
In a legal battle with the Trump 2016 Campaign, a former employee was accused of violating a non-disclosure agreement.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
The California Supreme Court held that time Apple employees spent waiting for and undergoing mandatory security inspections is compensable
Fenwick & West LLP
As we reported last year, the California Legislature passed AB 51 in an effort to prohibit employers from requiring employees to arbitrate claims under the California Labor Code
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
It should be clear to all that the NLRB has taken significant steps to restore the law to a footing that more closely resembles the landscape that existed prior to the Obama Board.
Proskauer Rose LLP
Applying the facially neutral work rule test laid out in Boeing (see here), the Board recently reversed an Administrative Law Judge decision, concluding that...
Cooley LLP
Judge Mueller has since heard additional arguments regarding whether AB 51 should be allowed to take effect.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
California employers, particularly those in the retail industry, routinely implement security screenings of employees exiting the premises to limit the risk of employee theft.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth's Jerry Maatman and Alex Karasik Discuss The Impact Of New State Laws On Illinois Employers.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Gerald Maatman was interviewed February 18th on the XpertHR Podcast, "Podcast: Why Class Action Employment Cases Are on the Rise."
Holland & Knight
Another California federal judge has denied a request to the block the enforcement of California Assembly Bill (AB) 5 while the lawsuit challenging the statute is pending.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
In a 29-page decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Fisher v. SD Protection Inc., No. 18-2504, that a district court had abused its discretion by rewriting a FLSA settlement agreement ...
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted summary judgment for franchisor Choice Hotels International, Inc. (Choice Hotels)
Littler Mendelson
Following the lead of other courts around the country, a Pennsylvania state court has held that employees can bring lawsuits against their employers asserting claima...
Proskauer Rose LLP
Today, in Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that time spent by non-exempt employees undergoing mandatory bag or other security checks is compensable
Littler Mendelson
On January 24, 2020, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals became the second federal appellate court to address whether notice of a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Last June, we wrote a Legal Update on Recent Developments in Securities Litigation: The "Event Driven" #MeToo Lawsuit.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
The Supreme Court of California recently agreed to review the California Court of Appeal's decision in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, 40 Cal. App. 5th 1239 (2019), as limited to the following question:
BakerHostetler
We've blogged several times the ongoing saga involving AB 51, California's attempt to prevent the mandatory arbitration of employment claims largely by sanctioning employers who use such agreements.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
A California district court has denied a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit brought by Uber and Postmates challenging the constitutionality of California's new worker classification law...
McDermott Will & Emery
Certain employers might prefer to avoid hiring nicotine users: smokers, dippers and vapers alike. U-Haul International Inc. will do so, with its policy going into effect on Feb. 1.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Mondaq Social Media