Current filters:  
United States
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
A TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d)...
Hogan Lovells
On February 7, 2020, and effective February 15, 2020, the USPTO issued a new examination guideline titled, Mandatory Electronic Filing and Specimen Requirements (Guide 1-20)...
DLA Piper
Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e), a petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner in an IPR that results in a final written decision may not assert in a district court litigation that a claim
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
This article breaks down the arguments likely to be heard by the Supreme Court.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Ever wonder if you can get a refund after you pay an oral hearing fee? As provided under 37 CFR § 1.26(a), a change of purpose after the payment of a fee...
Pryor Cashman LLP
On Friday, the United States Trademark Office ("USPTO") announced changes to the trademark rules of practice that will go into effect on February 15th, 2020.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The USPTO refused registration of the proposed mark J HUTTON for "Eyewear, eyewear frames and sunglasses," finding the mark to be primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4).
Ropes & Gray LLP
The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) does not accept trial grounds under 35 U.S.C § 112 in Inter Partes Review.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Benjamin's video begins with abbreviated scenes of Hughes's pre-election optimism and post-election disappointment.
Haug Partners
Haug Partners
Beginning on February 15, 2020, with very few exceptions, submissions before the US trademark office will be required to be filed digitally
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Aldo Martinez wrote an article featured in Westlaw IP entitled "The Adversarial Process of Working with Patent Examiners – and How to Speed up a Patent Application."
Jones Day
New USPTO rules make electronic filing mandatory and update requirements for specimens of use.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Since its creation in 1982, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has been the central forum for reviewing the nation's technology disputes.
Pryor Cashman LLP
Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, will be a moderator at The New York Intellectual Property Law Association's event, Trademark Update: A Discussion with a USPTO Policy Maker and a TTAB Decision Maker.
Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.
Enacted in 2016, the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides a federal cause of action for trade secret theft. The DTSA was a significant development because it put trade secrets
Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
An important part of black history is the many inventive contributions of black Americans. The achievements of just a few of them are highlighted below.
Womble Bond Dickinson
Forfeiting profits is a worst-case-scenario for companies accused of trademark infringement. The possibility of turning over profits certainly is a threat that...
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Following the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) Precedential Opinion Panel's selection of Hulu, LLC v. Sound View Innovations, LLC[1] as precedential...
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Last week, I wrote about an old fashioned family dispute over the rights to the FLETCHER trademark for corn dogs.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Conference New York United States
Font Size:
Mondaq Social Media