Taiwan: Can A Forum Selection Clause Divest Taiwan Courts Of Jurisdiction?

Whether and to what extent is a foreign forum selection clause enforceable? Taiwan's courts take a liberal view of this question.  Parties to a contract are free to create such a clause to have their disputes tried at a foreign court even if the foreign court does not have inherent jurisdiction over the disputes, but the clause must meet a three-part test to get recognized as enforceable by a Taiwan court: first, the dispute must not be subject to exclusive jurisdiction of a Taiwanese court (e.g. a dispute over a piece of land in Taiwan); second, the foreign court must not be subject to a rule that prohibits against acquired jurisdiction through consent; and third, the clause must not be "obviously unfair."

Despite this liberal attitude, Taiwan's courts take a stricter stance when such a clause might be interpreted to have the disputes tried exclusively at a foreign court at the expense of divesting a Taiwan court of its inherent jurisdiction.  When the parties' intention is unclear, parallel jurisdiction is usually the preferred interpretation for this sort of clause (just as dual citizenship is basically allowed for a Taiwanese national who becomes a naturalized foreign citizen.)  This position has been reaffirmed in a recent decision by Taiwan's Supreme Court. Overseas Credit Guarantee Fund (OCGF) v. Chung, 108 Tai-Kang 373, Taiwan's Supreme Court (May 2019).

Brought before the Supreme Court were actually two forum selection clauses, one nesting within the other, because the dispute arose from a tripartite relationship among (1) OCGF, a credit insurer created by Taiwan's government, (2) Chung the borrower who holds dual Taiwanese and US citizenship, and (3) a bank in Los Angeles, California as the lender.  At the outer layer, the agreement produced in English between OCGF and Chung contains a clause that reads:

Any indebtedness owed by Borrower to OCCGF (the old name of OCGF—the writer's note) shall be governed by and construed under the laws and submitted to the court specified in the Credit Facility Agreement between the Bank and the Borrower.

Linked to the above clause was the clause in the Credit Facility Agreement (also produced in English) which specifies the forum consented by the bank and the borrower. It reads:

If there is a law suit, Borrower agrees upon Lender's request to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of LOS ANGELES County, the State of California.

The OCGF sued the borrower based upon a subrogation claim to recover OCGF's insurance payment to the bank triggered by the borrower's default in repayment to the bank loan, and it chose to file the lawsuit in Taiwan.  To be more precise, the lawsuit was filed with the District Court of the Kaohsiung City, where the borrower's household registration was kept.  That is because, number one, under Article 1 of Taiwan's Code of Civil Procedures, a district court has inherent and general personal jurisdiction over any person residing within its jurisdiction.  Number two, more importantly, under a long-standing court practice, an individual defendant is deemed to be a resident of Taiwan suppose he or she holds a Taiwanese household registration, while evidence of actual residence is not necessary.

Did the Taiwanese district court have jurisdiction over this subrogation claim dispute? Or, to put it in another way, did the two-fold forum selection arrangement as described above create exclusive jurisdiction of the LA courts over the subrogation claim dispute between the OCFG and the borrower?  The lower courts' answer was "no" to the first question and "yes" to the second, and so they ruled in the borrower's favor and dismissed the case on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.

However, the Supreme Court adopted the opposite view, holding that:

A consent to jurisdiction in the international level should normally be presumed to have merely the effect of allowing the consented court to exercise general jurisdiction (over the parties regarding the disputes of concern), but not necessarily exclusive jurisdiction, unless there is an explicit expression by the parties or a special circumstance indicating otherwise to support a finding of acquired exclusive or sole jurisdiction (of the consented foreign court).

In the present case, the Credit Facility Agreement between the borrower and the bank includes a clause which, as the district court found, stipulates that the courts of Los Angeles are consented to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over this dispute.  However, the disputed clause in the agreement between the OCGF and the defendant merely stipulates that these two parties agree to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court specified in the agreement between the borrower and the bank, but it does not stipulate explicitly that the courts of LA shall be the courts with exclusive or sole jurisdiction by consent.

Moreover, OCFG the plaintiff is a legal person incorporated under this country's laws, and the defendant is again a national of this country and holds a household registration in Kaohsiung City.  Therefore, the (district) court of this country has inherent jurisdiction over civil disputes between the said two parties.  Since no consent from the same parties can be found to preclude any court of this country from exercising its jurisdiction, the law shall not deny OCFG's filing a lawsuit with the district court of the county where the defendant's residence is located.

Interestingly, the lower courts' decisions did not reflect (as the Supreme Court's decision did) a presumption for retaining Taiwan courts' jurisdiction in face of a foreign forum selection clause whose textual meaning is found to be obscure.  Instead, the lower courts held that where a foreign forum selection clause is obscure in meaning, the court should "probe into the parties' intention" by taking into consideration all relevant facts.  More, instead of taking the defendant's household registration at face value, the district court judges delved into the issue and discovered that, despite his Taiwanese household registration, the defendant had been a naturalized US citizen since 1995, had been living in California since 1984, and had seldom visited Taiwan since 1997.  It was based on these facts, coupled with the defendant's assertion that the loans he borrowed in 1998 were for the use of his company which was again located in LA, that the lower courts ruled to divest themselves of jurisdiction over this case.  However, the Supreme Court did not accept this approach.

At the end of the day, parties to a contract shall be more well-advised with wordings of a contract by the force of which they intend to get totally detached from a Taiwan court's inherent jurisdiction, especially when at least one party is an individual and still holds a household registration in Taiwan.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions