Taiwan: The Determination Of Whether A Reasonable Motivation Exists For The Combination Of The Prior Art References

In accordance with Taiwan's Patent Act, a patent may not be obtained if the distinctions between an invention sought to be patented and the located prior art references are such that the invention as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains.  Moreover, to establish a prima facie case of obviousness in a patent application, an invalidation action or a patent infringement lawsuit, the Examiner or Judge is obliged to show that there is some teaching, suggestion, or motivation in the prior art that would have led a person having ordinary skill in the art to combine prior art reference teachings to arrive at the claimed invention.  

As a general rule, when considering the obviousness of the combination of the prior art references, the Examiner or Judge should evaluate if the primary prior art reference and the other references located to cure the deficiency of the primary reference are in analogous fields of art, have common problems to be solved and serve the same or similar intended purpose.  To illustrate the implications of this principle, Taiwan's IP Office published in 2017 a revised Examination Framework regarding the "inventive step" of an invention, which provides, among others, a four-prong test to determine whether there would be a "reasonable motivation" for a  person having ordinary skill in the art to combine the relevant located references. The test permits the consideration of four parameters, namely, (1) whether the located prior art references belong to analogous fields of art; (2) whether the problems sought to be solved are common; (3) whether the references have common functionality; and (4) whether any explicit or implied teaching or suggestion can be found in the state-of-the-art or the knowledge of a person having ordinary skill in the art and enables the person to combine the located references. 

While it is valuable to have a closer look at the interrelations among the four parameters and how they are applied to actual cases, alone or in combination, the Judges of the Supreme Administrative Court have recently expressed their consensus opinion in a Ruling rendered on a Patent Invalidation Case as follows:

  1. In the determination of whether a plurality of prior art references have common functionality, consideration should be given to the "overall structure" rather than the "common structure" of the relevant devices. 

The patented invention under invalidation is related to an electric fan and its manufacturing method, the main technical feature of which resides in an improved method for combining a fan transit shaft and a metal shell.  As for the five prior art references cited by the invalidation petitioner against the validity of the patent, the primary reference 1 is related to a "spindle motor", and the other references 2, 3 and 5 are all in the field of "electric fans".

The IP Court's Ruling decided that reference 1 can be combined with reference 2 or 3 in an obvious manner. The main reasons are: "[t]he devices disclosed in reference 1 and reference 2 or 3 have common functionality. First, the device disclosed in either references 1 or 2 has a rotor and a stator which can drive the spindle to rotate and in turn allow the external carrier to rotate.  Second, references 1 and 3 both relate to the use of the motor principles to allow external carriers or impellers to rotate."

Nonetheless, in the determination of whether a plurality of references have common functionality, consideration should be accorded to not only the function of the "common structure" of the devices disclosed in the references but also the function of the "overall structure" thereof.   While reference 1 has disclosed "a spindle motor installed on a device such as HDD, optical disk, optical magnetic disk, or magnetic disk", references 2 and 3 are both related to "electric fans". Apparently, the device disclosed in reference 1 is in a field not analogous to the field to which the device disclosed in reference 2 or 3 belongs.  Although the devices disclosed in reference 1, 2 and 3 have a common motor mechanism for rotation, the overall structure, and the manufacturing method disclosed in reference 1 have nothing to do with the disclosure in reference 2 or 3.  These distinctions are not too minute to be noticed, especially when the purpose intended to be served by reference 1 is not the same as that intended by reference 2 or 3.

Reference 1 has disclosed a spindle motor with a durable bearing, which was invented with a view to acquiring a high impact resistance effect, whereas reference 2 is related to a fan motor with an improved heat-dissipation effect.  It is not inappropriate for the patentee to aver that there would not be a reasonable motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art to combine these two references serving totally different purposes. 

  1. A more stringent standard should be adopted in the determination of whether the problems to be solved by a plurality of references are "common."  To be more specific, the problems intended to be solved need to be substantially the same, rather than being merely related.

The IP Court found that reference 5, as well as references 2 and 3 are in the same technical field.  Further, as the problems intended to be solved by references 1 and 5, respectively, are related, there should be a reasonable motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art to combine them.  However, such conclusion is apparently against the criteria set out in the Examination Framework published by the IP Office, which provide that a reasonable motivation to combine a plurality of references is existent only if the problems intended to be solved thereby, respectively, are substantially identical.

This precedent suggests a higher threshold to be met in establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. It is worth observing whether there will be future cases giving support to the Supreme Administrative Court's finding regarding the combination of the prior art references.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions