Bermuda: Letter From Paradise: Insurance Risks And Reputations In The Offshore World

Last Updated: 23 January 2018
Article by Mark Chudleigh

At 18:00 GMT on Sunday 5 November 2017, I, like many others living in offshore financial centres (OFCs), was poised to review the publication of the "Paradise Papers", which the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) had promised would include startling revelations about the use of so-called "tax havens" by wealthy individuals and corporations, following a data breach at leading offshore law firm, Appleby.

"Is that it?" was the initial reaction.

There were several examples of famous persons and corporations using offshore trusts and corporations for entirely legal – and well-known - tax mitigation purposes (the morality of which is open to debate), but no evidence of anyone doing anything illegal. Amongst all the voyeurism, it was overlooked that the "Paradise Papers" themselves were stolen property, much of it private and legally privileged material pertaining to individuals.  Nor did the press seem to recognise the irony that, whilst castigating OFCs for their supposed "secrecy", they were content to receive and publish stolen materials from a secret source.

The pejorative term "tax haven" - which implies lax regulation and lack of transparency in addition to low or no income or corporation taxes - is not one that is accepted by any of the leading OFCs: Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, Jersey and Guernsey, the jurisdictions on which this article focusses.

OFC regulation and practice

Whilst there are certainly jurisdictions that meet the "tax haven" label, these five OFCs are all tightly regulated with anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing (AML/ATF) regulations at least as stringent as in the UK.

Indeed, in many respects these OFCs have been ahead of "onshore" jurisdictions with many offshore financial institutions and professional service providers having instituted voluntary AML/ATF measures long before they - or their onshore counterparts - were required. Regulation beyond AML/ATF is also at an internationally accepted standard.  For example, in 2016 Bermuda's regulator, the Bermuda Monetary Authority, was granted "equivalent" status by the EU under "Solvency II" in recognition of its robust scheme of insurance regulation.

Lack of transparency is also a myth.  Each of these five OFCs has tax information exchange agreements with leading onshore jurisdictions and all have implemented (or are in the process of implementing) the OECD "Common Reporting Standard" (CRS) whereby persons investing in those jurisdictions will have their financial account information automatically submitted to relevant tax authorities. Bermuda, for example, also has an intergovernmental agreement with the US pursuant to the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), ensuring the automatic disclosure of financial details for US tax payers. Only last month, the EU published a "black list" of 17 non-cooperative jurisdictions, based on criteria including transparency and fair taxation, which excluded all the OFCs covered by this article.

But there is no doubt that OFCs, and those working in the offshore finance sector, are feeling the heat: in the current climate, OFCs cannot afford to put a foot wrong, as they seek to demonstrate to the outside world that they are responsible jurisdictions.  And, inevitably, some of the media mud has stuck, with individuals and corporations questioning whether it is worth using offshore structures. For example, Thames Water recently announced it would be closing the company's Cayman subsidiaries (used to raise international finance to fund infrastructure improvements in the UK), even though Thames Water claimed there to be no tax advantage accruing to them as a result.  As the company's chairman said, "it just looks wrong".  

Claims activity

With this in mind, what claims activity has been seen in OFCs or can be expected by financial institutions and professionals operating in OFCs (who, almost exclusively, purchase their errors and omissions insurance from the London market)?

The need for offshore regulators to demonstrate their effectiveness has obvious implications for all regulated entities.  There was a time when regulators in OFCs were regarded as "toothless", anxious to avoid a reputation for excessive regulatory interference in a highly competitive environment with other OFCs. This is no longer the case and indeed many believe that offshore regulators are actively seeking defaulting parties to "throw the book at".

Insurers providing cover for regulatory investigations can expect increased activity, both in terms of the level of costs of responding to an investigation as well as the resulting sanctions (where insurable). 

Offshore professionals are also increasingly exposed to the long reach of onshore authorities.  In addition to obligations arising under the CRS and FATCA, offshore professionals are subject to statutes such as the UK's Criminal Finances Act 2017, which imposes criminal penalties for the facilitation of tax evasion.

As far as offshore banks are concerned, the increased focus on AML/ATF compliance – both onshore and offshore – has had profound implications.  For leading multi-national banks, many rocked by widespread regulatory enforcement actions and huge fines in the US and Europe, the compliance implications of operating in OFCs may not be worth the benefits. HSBC, for example, closed its Cayman operations in 2014 and later divested its trust administration business in Bermuda. 

Increased concerns about AML/ATF have also led many onshore banks to question the value of their correspondent banking relationships with independent banks in OFCs, presenting a potential existential threat to some offshore banks.  On the customer front, however, offshore banks continue to enjoy a level of protection often not found onshore, with extremely broad exculpation clauses commonplace in customer agreements, presenting severe hurdles for customers wishing bring compensation claims.

Offshore professional trustees have been a distressed risk class for several years. The heavy compliance burden, combined with a move towards more proactive trust management, has increased their operating costs and in turn encouraged consolidation to enhance economies of scale. 

Litigation by beneficiaries against trustees has seen a marked increase, in large part as a result of a greater litigation appetite by third or fourth generation beneficiaries.  The need to restructure or to collapse older, "dynastic" trusts for high net worth families, perhaps in response to onshore tax considerations, also increases the likelihood of claims against trustees as issues come to light during the restructuring, or trustees get caught in the cross fire of family disputes.

Offshore law firms have not seen any notable change in claims activity since the financial crisis, despite their central role in offshore finance. There is an obvious cyber risk to firms focusing on private client and corporate work, with hackers attracted by the possibility of "Paradise Papers" type revelations. However, it is understood that there have not been any significant client claims against Mossak Fonseca (the firm at the centre of the "Panama Papers") and it remains to be seen whether Appleby will face compensation claims from clients as a result of the disclosure of client information by the ICIJ.

Tailing off

The huge spike in litigation involving hedge funds in the wake of the financial crisis (predominantly in the Cayman Islands) has tailed off substantially in recent years.  In a judgment of the Guernsey Court in September, seven former executives of Carlyle Group's mortgage-bond fund, which collapsed in 2008 with over US$1 billion of losses, prevailed on each one of the almost 200 allegations by the plaintiff liquidators, consistent with the trend of failed attempts to hold fund directors liable for investor losses.

Offshore directors continue to be a relatively protected species and, apart from the shock ruling of the Cayman Court in the Weavering case [2011], where the directors were found to have acted with willful default in relation to the loss of US$111 million (which judgment was subsequently set aside by the Court of Appeal in 2015), there have been few judgments of concern for insurers. 

Notwithstanding this, the practice in many OFCs of professional directors (many of them lawyers) holding multiple directorships – often in the hundreds – has come under sustained criticism and led a move towards such persons holding fewer directorships and taking a more active role in corporate affairs.  This may improve corporate governance but it may also increase the exposure of professional, non-executive directors who may no longer be able to claim they lacked knowledge of impugned transactions.

OFCs are used to being caught up in the politics of onshore jurisdictions.  If these OFCs are to survive (and I am confident they will), it will be critical that they continue to demonstrate that they are responsible, and cooperative, jurisdictions that play a valuable role in international finance and affairs. 

Mark Chudleigh is a partner with Kennedys Law LLP's affiliated Bermuda office, Kennedys Chudleigh Ltd.

A version of this article previously appeared inInsurance Day on 14th December 2017.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions