Sweden: Stockholm Chamber Of Commerce To Provide Decisions On Arbitrator Challenges

Last Updated: 28 November 2017
Article by Philippa Charles

The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce has announced that it will provide reasons for its decisions on challenges to arbitrators, making it the third institution to do so.

From 1 January 2018, the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) will begin providing reasons for its decisions on challenges to arbitrators, joining the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), which was the first to do so in 2006, and the ICC International Court of Arbitration (ICC) that followed suit in 2015.

According to a release, the SCC Rules do not require the board to motivate any of its decisions, including those related to challenges. However, it has chosen to do so occasionally, in order to benefit parties and arbitrators.

The new policy means that the organisation will provide reasoned decisions on all arbitrator challenges decided by the board, unless the parties agree otherwise.

Annette Magnusson, secretary general at the SCC, said in a statement: "We believe that giving parties and arbitrators insight into the board's decision-making with regard to challenges will further enhance their confidence in the arbitral process."

Transparency is vital

The word transparency in now a buzzword for institutions to inform commercial parties and legal practitioners of its processes.

Speaking to CDR, James Hope, partner and head of litigation and arbitration at Vinge in Stockholm, and a member of the SCC board, tells CDR: "What's particularly interesting is this whole requirement for transparency," and adds that "the arbitral institution is the final decision-maker on this issue, which means at least as far as we were concerned, natural justice generally suggests that you need reasons before a final decision".

Clare Ambrose, an arbitrator at 20 Essex Street, states that "it's not that surprising that the SCC is following the LCIA and the ICC and there are good reasons of legitimacy and transparency for giving some reasons for these decisions".

This drive towards transparency has resulted in institutions consistently updating and amending their rules and guidance. In July 2016, the ICC revised its process for transparency, giving its users more clarity during the scrutiny process, particularly.

Pontus Scherp, partner at Norburg Scherp in Sweden, explains: "There has been lately a growing use and demand of transparency in arbitration in general, which will "enhance the transparency in the arbitration process more".

Referring to the 2015 International Arbitration Survey, conducted by the Queen Mary University of London and White & Case, which collated views from stakeholders on the improvements of international arbitration, Scherp says that "transparency on this issue... ended up at the top of the wish list".

Philippa Charles, partner and head of international arbitration at Stewarts explains that the move by the SCC is "part of a general drive towards transparency in arbitration administration, which institutions have been working on for the last several years. The SCC's approach mirrors and in some cases amplifies the approach which has been taken by the LCIA and also by the ICC".

She continues: "I think overall, the generation of a body of reasoned decisions in relation to arbitrator challenges is a useful resource, both for inexperienced arbitrators and more experienced arbitrators (and party counsel) to understand the application of the principle in practice".

Publication and tactics

As the LCIA, the ICC and the SCC have demonstrated, there is collective thought for greater transparency for all facets of arbitration, including on challenges, which could perhaps prevent parties from using them tactically.

Clarifying the new SCC development, Ambrose explains that the decisions themselves are still going to remain confidential to the parties and will not be in the public domain, so in that sense transparency is limited; although most institutions do then publish summaries of their decisions that are anonymised.

While challenges are now more transparent, Ambrose believes that publishing reasons for decisions will not stop parties using challenges tactically, but adds that: the reasons will assist the parties in understanding what led the institution to make its decision: "When the decisions are published in summary form, there will be greater knowledge."

Expanding on that view, Charles explains that "if a party is determined to make a challenge, even in a set of circumstances that are equivalent to those that have already been decided and published, they'll go ahead anyway, because if they're making a challenge for tactical reasons, either to buy time or create disruption, then the mere fact that a similar challenge has previously been dismissed won't necessarily restrain them from doing so".

Hope states that the use of an arbitral challenge as a strategy is an interesting consideration, adding that "if you put in reasons, sometimes people can let and invoke those reasons and try to suggest that that gives them grounds for further complaint".

However, he stresses that this is something the SCC is alive to and takes very seriously.

He says that decisions involve the SCC's entire board, including Swedish and international members, so when the board makes a decision, it is not simply off-the-cuff.

Arbitrator challenges

The statistics for challenges show how frequently or infrequently they are used. In April, the LCIA published its facts and figures for 2016, revealing that a total of six challenges were made to arbitrators appointed under LCIA Rules.

There were 16 challenges against arbitrators last year at the SCC, of which 70% were rejected. For the small number of requests for release, half resulted in the resignation of an arbitrator.

Whereas the ICC had a total of 50 challenges on 2016, whether for impartiality, independence or other reasons, of which just five were accepted by the court.

The obvious issue for challenge is in the investment treaty space, "where you have someone sitting as arbitrator, who is also acting as counsel in other investment treaty cases and taking a particular line as party counsel which is said to amount to a fetter on their neutrality as arbitrator on that issue", Charles says.

While in the commercial arbitration space, "it's much more likely to be the case that someone's going to be challenged if there's a perception that they've, for example, been appointed too frequently by a particular firm", she adds.

Summarising the reasons behind the SCC's move, Hope concludes: "The intention is to provide an even better service to the parties, I think it should be seen in that light, that's what we're trying to do."

Meanwhile, in October, the SCC named five new board members with litigation and arbitration experience, who will be appointed as of 1 January 2018.

Originally published in Commercial Dispute Resolution (CDR): SCC to provide decisions on arbitrator challenges.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions