Recently, the District Court discussed the legality of the Texas
Hold'em Poker game. This was due to a criminal appeal against a
Magistrate Court's verdict in regards to the charges that were
served against the appellant and her husband, for organizing a
Texas Hold'em Poker tournament in their apartment. The appeal
dealt with only one question – is Texas Hold'em Poker
illegal or not; more precisely – does the element of luck
override the element of skill in this game, as the state claims or
does skill override luck, as the appellant claims. According to
Israeli law, the element of chance has to be the decisive factor in
a game for it to be considered gambling (on top of additional
factors required, which will not be discussed here).
The claims of the appellant in this matter were based, inter
alia, on the opinion of a professor from the Bar Ilan University,
who is a specialist in probability.
The District Court rejected the appeal and ruled that the Texas
Hold'em Poker game is an illegal game, as the element of luck
is the deciding factor in the game. The Court ruled that the above
issue needs to be determined by examining just one Poker game, and
not a Poker tournament, considering the language of the Penal Law.
Accordingly, the use of bluffing during the game does not change
this conclusion, since this ability has long term significance and
is not relevant for a single Poker game.
This verdict has significant importance; firstly, the Israeli
jurisprudence with regards to the main element of Poker –
luck or skill, was until today very limited. Secondly, the District
Court's verdict dealt head on with the main claims on this
issue and with the opinion of a professor of probability, and ruled
that the element of luck overrides the element of skill in the
game. This ruling will affect the organizers of games and
tournaments of Texas Hold'em Poker games as well as the players
– since the organization of the games is illegal and
participating as a player is a criminal offence.
However, it is important to mention that this verdict dealt with
a game that took place in the apartment of the appellant and her
husband and not with online Poker; at least with regards to online
Poker we cannot disqualify the argument that there has to be a
renewed examination of the issue, perhaps leaving room for a
different verdict in respect of such.
Originally published on January 6, 2016
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The hotel industry has seen a huge rise in activity in the Middle East in the last decade.
Major international operators have entered the region in force, and have run successful
and profitable operations.
The Advertising Standards Authority of South Africa is an independent body set up and paid for by the marketing communication industry to ensure that its system of self-regulation works in the public interest.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).