Operators in the trustee sector may be familiar with the
restrictions contained in the Trusts and Trustees Act (Cap.331 of
the Laws of Malta, "TTA") that the MFSA have interpreted
as obliging authorised trustees (and fiduciary mandataries and
administrators of private foundations) to only offer CSP services
to persons to whom trustee services are being offered and not,
therefore, to persons that are not also the recipients of trustee
services. This was the result of an interpretation of the relevant
provisions dealing with the regulatory requirements for trustees,
fiduciary mandataries and administrators requiring them to:
Only carry on activities ancillary or incidental to the main
services, and to not have objects which are not compatible with
such an activity; and
To actually conduct activities that are compatible and
connected with the main services provided (paras (a) and (b) of
articles 43(4)(i), 43(13)(i) and 43(15)(i) of the TTA).
The interpretation gave rise to a reality that presented severe
difficulties for those trustee companies that either did not have a
separate CSP company within the group or which, following the
enactment of the Company Service Providers Act (Cap. 529 of the
Laws of Malta), actually liquidated their separate CSP company in
view of the exemption that the CSP Act contemplates for trustee
companies already authorised by the MFSA.
Although the proposed amendments to the TTA that would seemingly
relax the restrictions and finally formally allow trustee companies
to provide CSP services across the board, even to persons who are
not also recipients of trustee services, have not been enacted, the
consultation document issued by the MFSA on the 30th December, 2016
(and closing, following an extension, on the 15th February, 2017)
proposing the repeal of the Code of Conduct for Trustees and other
Fiduciaries and its replacement with a 'Rule Book' for
trustees and other fiduciaries, has shed some light on the
direction that the MFSA is likely to have taken on this matter and,
in fact, includes 2 whole sections (largely lifted from the CSP
Rules) in section 5 of the proposed rules, dealing with the
provision of company formation services by trustees and the
provision of director services by trustee companies. In them, the
MFSA refers to a proviso to the above-mentioned provisions (that
currently does not feature in the TTA) and which one can only
assume to constitute the solution to this practical problem. One
will, of course, have to await the actual enactment of the amending
act, but at least the inclusion in the proposed Rulebook for
trustees and other fiduciaries of rules regulating the provision of
corporate services by such authorised persons is very positive.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Following public consultation during 2016 and early 2017, legislation has been passed which will require Cayman Islands companies (but not partnerships) to maintain registers of beneficial ownership at their registered offices.
The Hong Kong market is presently faced with an increase in mainland private enterprises listing on the local exchange, resulting in shell planting and volatility in stock prices in the Growth Enterprise Market.
Choosing the right form of setup that can best suit a particular situation is important for a business owner. Here, we outline the major characteristics of the three forms of registration that foreign enterprises normally choose when registering a presence in Hong Kong.
Confidentiality of corporate documents and information is one of
the key attractions of incorporating a company in the BVI. A
company search of the BVI Registrar of Corporate Affairs will only
disclose certain information and documents.
In this case, the Court made it very clear that any arrangement which detracts from the ability of regulators or law enforcement authorities to identify beneficial owners of companies...
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).