An administrator was appointed over a company out of court and
the administration extended on a handful of occasions. The
administrator was then replaced by block transfer, but the
administration subsequently expired before it was concluded.
The new administrator therefore applied for a new administration
order to apply retrospectively from the date of expiry of the old
The court was satisfied that the new administrator had standing
to apply for an administration order as a creditor for unpaid fees.
The court was also satisfied that there was grounds for making the
new administration order, the company still being insolvent and the
statutory purpose still being achievable.
What exercised the Judge was whether he could make an
administration order with retrospective effect.
On the facts of this case, the Judge identified that certain
creditors would be prejudiced as to interest if a retrospective
order was made and it did not appear that this would be offset by
increased recoveries. In light of these uncertainties, the new
administrator withdrew the application for a retrospective
administration order and the Judge did not have to decide the
issue, simply making a prospective administration.
Whilst the Judge cited authority to make a retrospective
administration order, he said those authorities needed to be
treated with caution and each case assessed on its own facts.
In the matter of Elgin Legal Limited  EWHC 2523 (CH)
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
After much consultation and debate, the Ministry of Justice has published the final version of the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims (the Protocol), which is due to come into force on 1 October 2017.
Witnesses can, in various circumstances, be subpoenaed by the Courts of overseas jurisdictions to attend to give evidence by way of depositions within that jurisdiction. So why not take that one step further and ask a foreign court to subpoena the witness to give evidence by live satellite video link to a Court in London? This would be the next best thing to having the witness present in Court. Indeed, the Commercial Court is increasingly amenable to evidence being given in this way (albeit on a
Yesterday, in its quarterly consultation paper (CP 10/15), the FSA formally announced its intention to prevent investment firms using title transfer collateral arrangements (TTCAs) with retail clients.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).