In December 2016 the London Stock Exchange (LSE) reminded all
AIM companies about the need to liaise closely with their nomad
under AIM Rule 31. The LSE fined and privately censured an AIM
company £75,000 for breaching Rule 31 and not providing
necessary information to its nomad.
The fundamental purpose of AIM Rule 31 is to ensure that the
nomad is kept fully aware of developments and can fulfil its
regulatory role and responsibilities to the LSE, to advise and
guide the AIM company. In this instance the LSE found that the
Company failed to inform its nomad and seek advice regarding a
series of business developments. The LSE held it was not
appropriate for the company to decide whether or not the business
developments were disclosable based solely on its own assessment of
its obligations under the AIM Rules, without reference to its
The LSE also noted that:
the obligations to inform the nomad and seek advice regarding
business developments covered a wider range of developments than
would be required to be announced under AIM Rule 11;
it was not sufficient for the company to just send board
agendas and minutes to the nomad without any context or discussion;
contractual obligations between an AIM company and its nomad do
not override the Company's AIM Rules responsibilities.
The LSE noted it had "made clear, in a number of previous
published disciplinary actions and guidance, that appropriate
liaison between an AIM company and its nomad in accordance with AIM
Rule 31 is a fundamental tenet of the AIM Rules" and indicated
that it would continue to take formal disciplinary action where
Rule 31 is breached.
Aim companies and their nomads should ensure they have clear
channels of communication and regular dialogue on all developments
affecting the AIM company.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The recent case of Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd is a "101" guide to how not to run a small business, providing insight into the pitfalls that can await any director or shareholder...
As the Brexit negotiations start, one direct impact is an interest from clients and advisers looking to have flexibility in their organisational structure ahead of any legislative or other changes being implemented.
An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation.
Any UK companies doing business with the rest of the EU, or even just in the UK but relying on customers and suppliers who deal with the rest of the EU, should be keeping an eye out for the ramifications of Brexit.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).