Let's admit it - at some point or other we've all been
bored at work. Even the most interesting and challenging roles can
have their 'down days' where workloads are light or
repetitive tasks land on our desk.
However, spare a thought for Frederic Desnard, a French employee
who is suing his ex-employer for the equivalent of £282,000
in compensation. Mr Desnard claims that his managerial role at
French perfumiers Interparfum was so tedious and devoid of
responsibility that he suffered 'bore out.' Mr Desnard
claims that he was essentially side-lined by his employer and given
menial tasks or little to no work before finally being made
redundant. The stress and lack of stimulation, he claims, resulted
in serious depression and even triggered an epileptic fit whilst
driving. As such, the majority of his claim for £282,000 is
comprised of compensation for personal injury, but also includes
claims for holiday pay and the detrimental impact this has had on
his future career prospects.
This is a somewhat unusual case given that we tend to associate
stress cases with excessive hours, undue pressure and unrealistic
targets. But this does not necessarily mean this type of case could
not succeed here in theory. The Working Time Regulations 1998
provide for adequate rest breaks for workers whose health and
safety could be at risk due to the performance of monotonous tasks.
In practice, however, this is more likely to cover blue collar
workers performing assembly-line type of work.
If an employee feels that they have been side-lined and given
overly monotonous tasks, the most usual first step would be for
them to raise a complaint with their employer. Should the situation
continue after that, in English law the employee may have a
constructive dismissal argument – i.e. that they were
entitled to resign because their employer's treatment of
them(whether deliberate or neglectful) had breached their
To date, no decision has been made in Mr Desnard's case. It
will be interesting to see whether this type of case (the first of
its kind in France) will curry favour with the French Employment
Tribunal and,if in the unlikely event it does, whether such cases
will follow in the UK.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Everyone has sympathy for employees who are genuinely unwell. When advising employers about employees suffering from stress, various medical conditions and resultant absence, it is these words that come up again and again.
In our article published in HR Zone, we consider the introduction of the new rules on regulatory references which come into force on 7 March 2017 and the practical steps that employers must take to comply...
Most of us know the difference between being employed and being self-employed (or at least we think we do). And in everyday laymen's terms, the difference is relatively straightforward and obvious – if you are employed, you work for someone else and, if you are self-employed, you ‘work for yourself'.
This coming year looks to be another busy one with more significant employment law changes coming into force and we have highlighted some of the key changes, which range from the introduction of gender pay...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).