This month the EAT has revisited TUPE and the issues presented
by a change in client. Specifically, it has considered whether TUPE
can apply in the form of a service provision change when a
subsidised bus service is replaced by a competitor.
Hull City Council (the Council) subsidised a park-and-ride bus
service for CT Plus (Yorkshire) CIC (CTP) after CTP won a tendering
exercise. In 2013, the Council invited other tenders. Stagecoach
decided that it could run the service without a subsidy from the
Council and set up its own service on the same route. The Council
was not authorised to run a subsidised service in competition with
a commercial service, therefore it ended its contract with CTP on
28 September. Stagecoach began operating its service the next day.
CTP asserted that Stagecoach was obliged to take on its drivers
under the service provision change principles in the TUPE
The court's decision
The EAT decided that TUPE did not apply. Specifically, the
activity carried out before 29 September was the running of the
park and ride service by CTP on behalf of the Council. However,
from 29 September onwards, though the activity remained the same,
this was not carried out "on the Council's behalf"
but was instead undertaken by Stagecoach for its own commercial
interest. Therefore, CTP's argument that the Council was the
client both before and after the 29 September failed and Regulation
3(1)(b)(ii) was defeated.
The EAT's definition of "client" in this case is a
useful reminder of how to interpret its meaning in a TUPE context.
Though the users of the bus service (the passengers) essentially
remained the same, they are not the clients for the purpose of the
Though this particular scenario does not occur very often, it is
likely we may see similar situations arise as a result of mounting
pressure on councils to cut costs. Therefore, we might see an
increasing number of employees in this position, without any right
to transfer to a subsequent provider of services.
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The event will be attended by hundreds of students and representatives from top Italian and international law firms, who will have the opportunity to meet and discuss. For many students this will be the very first approach with the legal professional world, and for us it will be a great occasion to meet the young talents of the future.
Dentons is sponsoring the conference titled “Non-performing loans market, between demand and offer” organized by SDA Bocconi School of Management, one of the most prestigious business schools in the world.
The conference will be dedicated to present the results of an innovative and extensive research on the non-performing loans market, by making a clear distinction between demand and offer. The research tackles problems and opportunities perceived by the operators dealing with the NPL market.
The seminar will take place on 31 March 2017. It aims to provide German companies with an overview of the latest developments in relation to insurance coverage, banking transactions and legal aspects of doing business with Iran.
In SSE Generation Limited v Hochtief Solutions AG and another decided on 21st December 2016, the Court of Session in Scotland considered a contractor's potential design liability under the NEC Form of Contract.
Case law concerning the Agency Worker Regulations remains limited. We recently advised a recruitment business involved in a dispute with a "temp" and a hirer regarding who was liable for an alleged breach of AWR Regulation 5.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).