Employers are under duty to make reasonable adjustments to help
disabled job applicants and employees in certain circumstances.
This duty applies where a "provision, criterion or
practice" applied by or on behalf an employer puts a disabled
employee at a substantial disadvantage when compared to employees
who are not disabled. In G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Ltd v Powell
UKEAT/0243/15/RN, the EAT considered whether protecting an
employee's pay comes within the scope of a reasonable
Mr Powell (the Claimant) was employed by G4S Cash Solutions (UK)
Ltd (G4S) as an engineer to maintain cash machines. He developed
problems with his back and became unfit for his usual jobs, which
required heavy lifting and working in confined spaces. It was
accepted the Claimant's back problem amounted to a
Following a period of sickness absence the Claimant took on a
support role which had reduced physical demands. However, he
preserved the same rate of pay as his original role as an engineer.
After 12 months in this post, G4S tried to reduce the
Claimant's salary to a more appropriate rate for the support
role he was undertaking as it did not require the engineering
skills associated with the higher rate of pay. The Claimant refused
to accept this discount and was dismissed.
The Claimant asserted that G4S should have allowed him to remain
in his support role and continue to receive his higher
engineer's rate of pay. He claimed that by failing to do so,
G4S was in breach of its duty to make reasonable adjustments.
The EAT found that whilst pay protection is not automatically a
reasonable adjustment, there are certain circumstances where it can
be. The EAT concluded that this was a situation in which such an
adjustment would be reasonable and should apply. It based its
decision on the fact there was no sensible reason the duty to make
reasonable adjustments should exclude any requirement to protect an
employee's pay in conjunction with other measures to counter
the disadvantage suffered by that employee because of his
disability. Specifically, it highlighted that protecting an
employee's pay in these circumstances is no more than another
form of cost for an employer, equivalent to the cost of providing
extra training or support in other cases. Further, it identified
that additional cost to an employer will often be a feature of the
adjustment that an employer will be required to make for a disabled
employee in any case.
This case demonstrates that, whilst typically employers should
focus on the practical steps they can take to make reasonable
adjustments, there are times when it is appropriate to make a
direct financial adjustment to help keep a disabled employee in the
workplace. Though it is fact-specific, this judgment reiterates
that the key question for employers in cases such as this remains,
"what is reasonable in the circumstances?" considering
the adjustment contemplated and the resources available to the
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The event will be attended by hundreds of students and representatives from top Italian and international law firms, who will have the opportunity to meet and discuss. For many students this will be the very first approach with the legal professional world, and for us it will be a great occasion to meet the young talents of the future.
Dentons is sponsoring the conference titled “Non-performing loans market, between demand and offer” organized by SDA Bocconi School of Management, one of the most prestigious business schools in the world.
The conference will be dedicated to present the results of an innovative and extensive research on the non-performing loans market, by making a clear distinction between demand and offer. The research tackles problems and opportunities perceived by the operators dealing with the NPL market.
The seminar will take place on 31 March 2017. It aims to provide German companies with an overview of the latest developments in relation to insurance coverage, banking transactions and legal aspects of doing business with Iran.
In SSE Generation Limited v Hochtief Solutions AG and another decided on 21st December 2016, the Court of Session in Scotland considered a contractor's potential design liability under the NEC Form of Contract.
Case law concerning the Agency Worker Regulations remains limited. We recently advised a recruitment business involved in a dispute with a "temp" and a hirer regarding who was liable for an alleged breach of AWR Regulation 5.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).