South Korea: Treasury Shares As A Defence Mechanism Against Hostile Takeovers

Last Updated: 23 January 2017
Article by Sang Gon Kim

As a general rule, the Korean Commercial Code (KCC) forbids a company from acquiring its own shares (treasury shares) in accordance with principles of capital adequacy. One of the exceptions to this rule is the acquisition thereof through prescribed methods under the Securities and Exchange Act. Treasury shares acquired through this method do not have voting rights while in the possession of the company, yet despite that, they are recognized as a defence mechanism against hostile takeovers.

In a hostile takeover situation, the target company sells its treasury shares to a friendly third party and, in doing so, revives the voting rights associated with the shares. This way the target company is able steer shareholder voting in its favour. In addition, acquisition of treasury shares leads to a decrease in the number of shares exchanged in the market and a subsequent increase in share value, which may exert pressure on the acquiring company with respect to the capital it needs for the takeover. Further, the target company may obtain large-scale loans or use a substantial amount of its existing capital to acquire treasury shares, which may be detrimental to the acquiring company's purpose for the takeover.

In an actual case involving a hostile takeover, a company tried to sell its treasury shares to its controlling shareholder in order to defend itself from a third party. At one point, the courts had ruled that such disposition is lawful, but recently they reversed their position.

Case precedent holding that the disposition of treasury shares in a hostile takeover situation is lawful

Sovereign Fund's hostile takeover bid for SK Group

In 2004, Sovereign made a hostile-takeover bid for SK Corporation, which is the holding company of SK Group. In response, SK sold 9.67% of its 10.41% treasury shares to its friendly shareholders, including the creditor banks of SK Group. Sovereign, arguing that such disposition was unlawful, filed for a provisional disposition with the court, requesting that the votes associated with the sold treasury shares be enjoined from being exercised.

The court held in favor of SK, stating that the board resolution to dispose of the subject treasury shares in response to the hostiletakeover bid cannot be considered invalid. Moreover, if SK's acquisition of the subject treasury shares was lawful, then the disposition thereof cannot be said to be unlawful. The court also held that, in cases where a company disposed of its treasury shares for the purpose of helping existing management or the majority shareholder to unjustifiably keep control of the company, and in doing so harmed the interests of the company and other shareholders, such disposition may be unlawful. However, before such disposition is determined to be unlawful, it must first be established that the acquisition itself was unlawful. The court found that the board's decision to dispose of the treasury shares in response to the hostile takeover bid fell within the scope of business judgement.

From the time of this court decision to its decision involving Daelim Trading discussed below, it was believed that a company was allowed to sell its treasury shares to a friendly party for the purpose of defending itself against a hostile takeover bid.

Dispute involving Daelim Trading's management rights

In this case, a company owning 17.18% of its shares sold these shares to its majority shareholder when a dispute arose between the majority shareholder and the second-largest shareholder. In response, the second-largest shareholder filed a claim to nullify the treasury share purchase agreement, arguing that the above disposition was unlawful, and also filed a claim for provisional disposition to enjoin the voting rights associated with the treasury shares sold to the majority shareholder.

The court held that, the act by a company of disposing its treasury shares has an important impact on the rights and position of the shareholders depending on their shareholdings. In particular, if in a case where treasury shares are only sold to certain designated shareholders, then the resulting decrease in the shareholding of the existing shareholders would be tantamount to having issued new shares to third parties. As such, the restrictions imposed by the KCC on the issuance of new shares to third parties must also be applied in the case of selling treasury shares to certain designated shareholders and the disposition of treasury shares must not be used as a method to circumvent the restrictions. In this context, the court held that this case was one in which the disposition of treasury shares had an important impact on the interests of other major shareholders as well as on management and control rights of the company. Therefore, the share purchase agreement was deemed invalid and the treasury shares acquired thereby did not have any associated voting rights. (The KCC provides that new shares shall be issued to existing shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings, except in cases where certain necessities of the company, including financial reorganization or acquisition of certain technology, cannot be satisfied by the above issuance. In such situations, new shares may be issued to third parties.)

The Daelim Trading decision saw that, although disposition of treasury shares is different from the issuance of new shares in that the former does not increase the overall capital, the restrictions, which protect the interests of the existing shareholders, should also be applied in the case of disposing of treasury shares. Also, as with the issuance of new shares, existing shareholders should be provided with the opportunity to purchase treasury shares, and the act of selling treasury shares to a designated party without providing such opportunity would have an important impact on the interests of the existing shareholders as well as on management rights of the company. Based on this opinion, the court held that the subject disposition of treasury shares was invalid.

The Daelim Trading decision has been criticized for overly emphasizing the principle of shareholder equality, and critics have also argued that if the logic therein is conclusively upheld, then the disposition of treasury shares would no longer be a viable defensive mechanism against hostile takeovers.

Is the sale of treasury shares to third parties is lawful?

Currently, there are no laws that govern the issue of whether treasury shares may be sold to third parties in a hostile takeover situation. Due to this absence, in the past it was held that the above disposition was lawful in principle, and the only issue of concern was the fiduciary duty of directors. However, as discussed in connection with the Daelim Trading case, a new interpretation has arisen which argues that the disposition of treasury shares must be restricted similarly to the issuance of new shares to third parties.

However, issuing new shares and selling treasury shares are two different acts, thus it would not be reasonable to apply in its entirety the restrictions upon the latter. Ultimately, the main concern appears to be whether such act is a violation of a director's fiduciary duty. (Recently, the Ministry of Justice has been undertaking efforts to amend the KCC. The original draft amendment had provided that in case of selling treasury shares, the existing shareholders may acquire them in proportion to their shareholdings, which is identical to the court decision in the Daelim Trading case above, but such clause has now been deleted.)

Legal commentaries are of the view that the directors of a target company may defend against a hostile takeover if such bid harms the company and if the expenses incurred to defend the company or the value of lost opportunities in connection thereof are less than the harm caused by the hostile takeover. It appears that this logic would be applicable in the case of selling treasury shares. If a certain disposition of treasury shares to shareholders or third parties can be seen as falling within the scope of the board's business judgment, then the question of whether such disposition was lawful would be determined by the fiduciary-duty standard, i.e. the business judgment rule. According to the business judgment rule, the acts of the directors must be based on reasonable and justifiable grounds showing that there is reason to believe that the hostile takeover will harm the company. In addition, there must be objective grounds to show that the expenses required to defend against the hostile takeover are less than the harm caused by the hostile takeover. In order to meet the above requirements, the directors would have to procure ample objective and reasonable materials, solely based upon which they would have to decide their actions and from the company's point of view.

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions