United Arab Emirates: Forgery Under UAE Law

Last Updated: 18 August 2016
Article by STA Law Firm

Forgery under UAE Law

According to the Law of Evidence in Civil and Commercial Transactions Federal Law No. 10 of 1992 (the Law) the burden of proof is on the claimant which is an established principle and also stated under Article 1 of the Law. The law provides that the claimant or person claiming the fact is duty bound to prove his claim and the defendant shall have the right of denial.

The first proofs of evidence to substantiate the facts are the official and / or customary documents. It is also established in law that official or public documents, being created by public official are deemed to be a proof against all disputants, including what is proven unless falsified by methods stipulated by law. Customary document, being document created by parties, is a proof among the parties only, but for others it shall not be deemed evidence, except for certain conditions. For instance, official document may create right in rem and customary document may create only right in personam.

The basic principle of evidence is that the customary document shall be deemed to be issued by those who signed, unless he expressly denies his handwriting, signature, stamp or finger-print. However, if he cites the document in court or replies to it without any objection or relies on such document in court in favour of document, he will be considered to have accepted the authenticity of document or he cannot deny the admissibility of document. Further, if there is any forgery he has to challenge the forgery of document. If opponent declared authenticity of the stamp used in the customary document but denied impress, he shall use right to challenge for forgery.

It is imperative to note that customary document's origin being general and not official it is sufficient to just deny for excluding the effect of customary document, but it may not be sufficient in all or certain cases. In such cases, the challenge for forgery to deny such forged document is essential and one must prove forgery in the documents.

First - the definition of forgery in documents

Forgery is defined under Article 216 of the Federal Penal Code:

Article 216: "The forgery of a written instrument is to alter its reality in one of the manners described herein below, so as to cause prejudice, with the intention of substituting the false for the genuine instrument." The seven methods stated to be considered as committing the crime of forgery are as follows:

  1. "To alter a genuine instrument, whether by adding, or removing or changing any of its written parts, numbers, marks or pictures.
  2. To falsely sign or place a forged seal, or to alter a genuine signature, seal or imprint.
  3. To obtain by surprise or by fraud the signature, seal or imprint of a person who ignores the contents of the instrument or who has not validly given his consent thereon.
  4. To make falsely or imitate an instrument and attribute it to another person.
  5. To fill a blank paper which is signed, sealed or imprinted, without the approval of the person who has signed, sealed or imprinted it.
  6. To assume the name of another person or to substitute it in a document which has been prepared specifically to prove the identity of such other person.
  7. A material alteration of writing with a deceitful and fraudulent intent, preventing therefore the genuine intent of the instrument from being achieved."

In the above context it can be concluded that there are two types of forgery namely material forgery and moral forgery which are explained below:

Material forgery:  A material forgery is said to be carried out when a material change in the document is made by the forger that can be comprehended by sense such as eyes, whether it is addition, deletion or modification in the existing original document or by creating a new document.

Moral forgery: A moral forgery is said to be conducted when a forger creates a change in the meaning, content and circumstances at time of editing but not in material or form as editing articles or statements other than those made by the contractual parties. For instance: someone impersonating someone else in the contract or employee makes statements about a person in a document contrary to what he said or, stating that he took bribes or money while he has not received any money.

Let us consider this example: To prove false statements as true or to say that person knows about the facts which are not recognized or with which he is not acquainted with. For instance: A woman (Fatima) declares falsely that she is a real person i.e. a person she claims (Afreen) before official bailiff or a notary public and her statement is registered and the transaction is made on that factual basis, however in real circumstances she is pretending to be (Afreen) another women/character. Further, while pretending to be another women (Afreen) the forger women (Fatima) says that I am Afreen and receives an amount and signs as if she is Afreen. If Fatima says she is Afreen it will be oral forgery but if she also signs pretending she is Afreen it will oral as well as material forgery.

Material forgery can be easily exposed and proven as contrary to the moral forgery, which may be tricky to perceive and at the same time difficult to prove.

Any material and moral forgery made by the forger whether used or not used by forger can be attributed to the person who created the document. To exclude the impact of such document, several methods can be employed including denial which is sufficient in certain cases to exclude the impact of forged document, but in other cases denial may not be completely useful unless challenge for forgery is also filed. The denial and challenge for forgery is discussed elaborately below:

Denial

Pursuant to Article 11 and 23 (1) of the Law, mere denial of a person is enough in case of the customary document which may be challenged for forgery, while contesting the writing, seal, signature or fingerprint. Hence, it is for the other party relying on the document to prove its authenticity and thereby the onus of proof shifts on the person relying on the document.

The Court of Cassation in Dubai adjudicated the following in this regard: It is established in the judgment of this court that Article 11 and 23 (1) of the law of evidence that mere denial by a person is enough and the official or customary document, may both be challenged for forgery, while contesting the writing, seal, signature or fingerprint which applies only to informal documents until proven by opponent who holds onto its authenticity of signing the document. As the opponent is the one who is responsible for the burden of proof in this case and there is no necessity to take the person who denies to challenge for forgery on what was attributed to him as his signature.

On 19 November 2012, in appeal No. 93 of 2012 of the Court of Cassation ruled that a person who denies what is attributed to him by signing forfeit authentic document then the other party has to prove the signed document i.e. the party who seeks to rely on such document must prove its authenticity.

Second: - The Challenge for forgery

According to the Law and the provisions of the Court of Appeal and Cassation, it may not be sufficient to simply deny for excluding the effect of the allegedly forged document, such as official documents and it must be challenged for forgery in such cases as it is not permissible for person in respect of such document to simply deny the document which was attributed to him by handwriting or signature, stamp or finger-print. If the opponent has admitted the evidence of validity of stamp in customary document and denied impressing it in the way he had to take the challenge for forgery. (For instance: If director (D) of company (A) says that the stamp shown on the document is of their company however D has not impressed or it is not impressed under D's authority he cannot simply deny, he needs to challenge the document for forgery before the court)

Forgery Challenge procedures

Challenge for forgery is provided under Articles 28 to 32 of the Law:

  1. Challenge for forgery may be raised at any stage of the litigation. The challenger shall specify the points of alleged forgery, his evidence and the investigation process to be followed for proving it. All this shall be stated in a memorandum to be submitted to the court or mentioned in the minutes of the session. If the challenge shall give a result in the case and further the facts and documents in the case are not sufficient to convince the court of the veracity or forgery of the document, and moreover if the court deems that the investigation requested by the challenger may give a outcome which is acceptable, the court shall order for carrying out the investigation whether through verification by comparison or witnesses testimony or both in accordance with the provisions of law.
  2. The party challenged for forgery may interrupt the process of investigation at whatever stage it may be, if he abandons insisting to challenge the document. If such abandonment is filed by the challenger, the court shall order the seizure of the document.

The court may reject any document or seek cancellation even without forgery challenge being filed before it. The court must provide in its judgment, circumstances and evidence which proved that it is a forged document.

It is established by the judgments of the courts that pursuant to the terms of Articles 23 and 28 of the Law if any party challenges the forgery, the challenger party has to prove the subject matter of his challenge and supplement the same with a memorandum coupled with the evidence. However, the court will not be obliged to verify the same if the challenger has not provided evidence in his denial or if opponent himself did not request to investigate.

In Commercial Appeal number 260 of 2010, the Dubai Court of Cassation judgment dated 12 October 2010 states that the challenge for forgery can be made by any parties who apprehend the use of such document though it is not yet used (Articles 33-34)[1]

However, for the case of forgery, challenge cannot be filed if the document allegedly forged is already used and relied upon by the parties as per Court of Cassation which ruled as follows: Article 34 is provided for those who fear or apprehend the use of forged document.

The case of forgery cannot be filed if the document is already used and relied upon by the parties before the court. As per Article 34 of the Law the case must be initiated when the forgery is apprehended by the party. If the document is used by forger and case has been filed by using such forged document the party challenging the forgery must not file separate case and must challenge for forgery in the same case. In this case, the cheque being challenged as forged must be proved before the court in same case. In this case the forgery case was filed on 18 November 2013 and the criminal case based on cheque was filed on 22 December 2013 and hence forgery case was filed and accepted by criminal court before the other criminal case was filed relying on such alleged forged cheque.

The Dubai Court of Cassation ruled on 26 March 2015 in Civil Appeal Number 422 of 2014 that the court may suo moto initiate investigation and handwriting matching or the testimony of witnesses or both handwriting matching and forgery investigation and investigate the forgery as per provisions of Articles 24 to 27 of the Law.[2]

In Commercial Appeal number 3 of 2010 the Dubai Court of Cassation ruled on 7 June 2010 that if the forensic laboratory is appointed and if it considers that the papers are not sufficient to convince it, the court shall order an investigation for handwriting matching or hear witnesses or both. According to the Dubai Court of Cassation it is established that the text of the Articles 24 and 28 of the Law, the facts of the case and documents are not sufficient to convince the court regarding handwriting or signature. It shall order an investigation of handwriting or hear witnesses or both, conducts handwriting matching according to the rules established in the expert work and to hear witnesses according to the rules established in the testimony of witnesses and hear their testimony only with respect to proving handwriting or signature on the document attributed to him, that follows the same method to challenge by denial of signature or challenge for forgery.

As per the Civil Appeal case number 228 of 2009 of Court of Cassation judgment dated 15 November 2009 the ratification of the documents does not prevent the challenge for forgery as the same can be made against any documents whether formal or customary or issued outside the country, even if it was attested by those who represent it and official authorities in the country where these documents are issued.

Footnotes

1 "The holder of an informal document may file a principal case , through the ordinary procedures , against the person involved in this document to admit that it is in his own handwriting , his signature , seal or fingerprint , even if the embodied obligation is not due for payment . If the defendant appears and avows, the court shall record his acknowledgment and the plaintiff shall assume all expenses. The document shall be considered as acknowledged, if the defendant keeps silent or does not deny it or attribute it to someone else . If , however , the defendant denies the handwriting , the signature , the seal or the fingerprint , an investigation shall be carried out according to the preceding rules ; and if he refuses to appear without plausible excuse , the court shall adjudicate in his absence the veracity of the handwriting , signature , seal or fingerprint."

"Whoever apprehends that he may be confronted with a forged document , may sue the holder of such document , and whoever benefits from it , to hear the judgment that it is a forged document . The case in this respect shall be a principal case filed through the ordinary proceedings"

2 Article 24

1 - The court shall order investigation by way of comparison and / or hearing the witnesses in case the person designated by the document denies his handwriting , seal or fingerprint , or if the heir or successor - in - title denies knowing that the document was issued by whom he received the title , and the other party to the litigation persist on sticking to the document , and where the document is of significant value in the litigation and the facts and documents of the case were not sufficient to convince the court of the veracity of the handwriting , signature , seal or fingerprint .

2 - The verification by comparison will be carried out in accordance with the rules prescribed for expertise and the hearing of witnesses according to the rules prescribed for testimony of witnesses . The testimony of witnesses shall only be heard as concerns the performance of the writing , the seal or the fingerprint , on the document subject to investigation , by the person to whom the document was attributed to .

Article 25

1 - The Court will fix a hearing to be attended by the opposing parties in order to submit all documents in their possession to carry out the investigation by comparison , agree on those documents serving this purpose and have the party challenging the veracity of the document to give a specimen of his handwriting . Should the party challenging the veracity of the document abstain , without justification , from attending in person to give a specimen of his handwriting , the court may decide the veracity of this document . Should the party in charge of proving the veracity of the handwriting , the signature , the seal or the fingerprint fail to appear , the documents submitted to investigation by way of comparison adequate for this purpose .

2 - The judge presiding the hearing shall order the remittance of the document subject to verification , the papers to be compared and those serving as test for the handwriting , to the clerks' office after apposing his signature and that of the session clerk who shall both sign , as well , the report prepared by the president in which the condition and specifications of the document subject to verification shall be stated .

Article 26

1 - The verification by comparison of the contested handwriting , signature , seal , or fingerprint , as it is , will be for the party against whom the document subject to verification stands as a proof , as concerns the handwriting , signature , seal , or the fingerprint .

2 - In the absence of an agreement between the parties , shall only be admitted for verification by comparison , the following :

a - The handwriting , signature , seal , or fingerprint apposed on formal documents .

b - The part of the document , subject to verification , which the opponent admits its veracity .

c - His handwriting or signature which he writes before the Court or the fingerprint apposed before it .

Article 27

In case the court has adjudicated the veracity of the whole document , the contesting party shall be condemned to a fine ranging between a minimum of five hundred and a maximum of two thousands Dirham .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.