It has now been three years since the introduction of Employment
Tribunal fees (ET Fees). There is an ongoing challenge to ET Fees
by the union Unison, which is taking its judicial review case to
the Supreme Court. The publication of the government's
post-implementation review of the ET Fees, which was due by the end
of 2015, is still awaited. We suspect that this will be very low on
the government's current agenda, and that we can expect to
continue to wait for some time for this (if in fact it ever
There has been some formal review of ET Fees in the meantime. On
20 June 2016, the Justice Committee published a report titled
"Courts and Tribunals fees" (the Report) to assess the
impact of Tribunal fees (as well as changes to the Court fees
regime) on access to justice.
The Report identifies that the impact of ET Fees has had a
dramatic effect, with a 70 per cent decrease in the number of
claims being issued since their introduction. It considers that, in
light of this, the introduction of ET Fees has "had a
significant adverse effect on access to justice for meritorious
The Report is critical of the government's failure to
publish its review. It also criticises the government's
position that the drop in Employment Tribunal claims has been due
to the introduction of ACAS Early Conciliation (which came in at
around the same time) as "even on the most favourable
The Report concludes that a contribution by claimants to funding
their claim through the Tribunal (and Court) system is not a
problem in principle, but suggests that the level of fees should
generally be lower and should also be more proportionate to the
complexity of the case presented. The Report also suggests an
increase in the financial threshold for fee remission and special
consideration for women alleging maternity or pregnancy
It is clear that the introduction of ET Fees has had a
significant impact on the numbers of Employment Tribunal claims
being brought. The number of frivolous claims that we have seen
since the introduction of fees has all but disappeared. This is
obviously welcome news for employers. However, it simply must be
the case that there are some meritorious claims which are not
brought because of the fee regime. It is clear that whilst ET Fees
do serve a useful and valid purpose, they also limit access to
justice. Clearly a finer balancing exercise needs to take place,
and changes may need to be made to the fee regime along the lines
that the Report suggests. It will be interesting to see what
comment the Supreme Court makes (the hearing is due to take place
on 7 and 8 December 2016). However, unless it is given a pressing
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The seminar will take place on 31 March 2017. It aims to provide German companies with an overview of the latest developments in relation to insurance coverage, banking transactions and legal aspects of doing business with Iran.
The employment landscape is one that is constantly shifting. Employers who fail to keep up with the changes do so at their peril.
We are pleased to invite you to this seminar, designed to help in-house counsel and HR practitioners get to grips with key recent and forthcoming developments in employment, pensions and immigration law and practice and what they mean for your workforce.
In SSE Generation Limited v Hochtief Solutions AG and another decided on 21st December 2016, the Court of Session in Scotland considered a contractor's potential design liability under the NEC Form of Contract.
Case law concerning the Agency Worker Regulations remains limited. We recently advised a recruitment business involved in a dispute with a "temp" and a hirer regarding who was liable for an alleged breach of AWR Regulation 5.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).