The scope of the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and
Grievance Procedures (the Code) has been narrowed following
two recent claims concerning ill health and some other substantial
reason (SOSR) dismissals. If the Code applies, a Tribunal can
impose a financial penalty on anyone who unreasonably fails to
comply with it. Specifically, a Tribunal can impose an uplift or
reduction of up to 25 per cent in any award it gives. It is
accepted that the Code covers disciplinary situations, which
includes conduct and poor performance. The question in the two
recent cases was whether the Code specifically applied to ill
health and SOSR dismissals.
Mr Holmes was dismissed for reasons of ill-health following
several extensive periods of absence. Qinetiq did not receive the
most current occupational health report before making this
dismissal. Mr Holmes argued the dismissal was unfair and the
Tribunal should award him with an uplift in his compensation
because of Qinetiq's failure to adhere to the Code. Both the
Tribunal and the EAT rejected Mr Holmes's position. They held
that the Code does not apply to dismissals for genuine ill health,
as capability procedures relating to an inability to do the
job, due to sickness absence, do not come within the scope of the
Code. The EAT clarified that the Code only applies to capability
situations where there is some degree of culpability on the part of
Ms Stockman was dismissed by Phoenix House for a breakdown in
the working relationship following a grievance and disciplinary
procedure. Ms Stockman's unfair dismissal claim was upheld by
the Tribunal, which considered that the Code applied and granted Ms
Stockman a 25 per cent uplift in the compensation awarded. The EAT
agreed the dismissal was procedurally and substantively unfair,
however it did not consider the Code applied to an irretrievable
breakdown in the working relationship. The EAT accepted that
discrete features of the Code are capable of being applied in SOSR
circumstances, for example recommendations for the procedure
employers should follow in disciplinary and grievance matters.
However, it ultimately held that imposing a sanction for failure to
comply with the Code in other situations, such as in these
circumstances, would go beyond Parliament's intention.
Our view is that it is always good practice to follow the Code
in circumstances where an employee may be dismissed. However, where
employers want to follow an expedited procedure, it is useful to
have further guidance as to when the Code is likely to apply.
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A
top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm
is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent
and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways.
Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the
communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows
that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully
completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business
challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons'
global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local,
national and global needs of private and public clients of any size
in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
You are cordially invited to our workshop on processing of employees’ personal data in light of the new EU Regulation on Personal Data Protection (GDPR). The meeting is organized by Dentons together with the American Chamber of Commerce in Poland.
Dentons will hold a Competition Breakfast Seminar on February 28, 2017 titled: Rebates and discounts under EU competition law – lessons of the Intel case. Renowned competition lawyer James Venit from Dentons’ Brussels office will be joining co-heads Tihamér Tóth and Tünde Gönczöl of Dentons Budapest’s
You are cordially invited to a practical seminar on private antitrust enforcement in light of the soon to be implemented Damages Directive, which we address to the banking and finance sector. During the seminar we will present new tools designed for cartel damages litigation in light of fast forwarding the legislative process in Poland from a lawyer’s and an economist’s perspective. We will discuss examples of private antitrust litigation from a jurisdiction where the system is already effective and consider whether third party litigation funding is an option in Poland. All these points will help you identify potential claims against other market players and prepare a defense strategy against private enforcement claims targeting your institution.
Everyone has sympathy for employees who are genuinely unwell. When advising employers about employees suffering from stress, various medical conditions and resultant absence, it is these words that come up again and again.
In our article published in HR Zone, we consider the introduction of the new rules on regulatory references which come into force on 7 March 2017 and the practical steps that employers must take to comply...
Most of us know the difference between being employed and being self-employed (or at least we think we do). And in everyday laymen's terms, the difference is relatively straightforward and obvious – if you are employed, you work for someone else and, if you are self-employed, you ‘work for yourself'.
This coming year looks to be another busy one with more significant employment law changes coming into force and we have highlighted some of the key changes, which range from the introduction of gender pay...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).