Already on September 1st 2015 the Federal Act on Private
Security Services Provided Abroad PSSA entered into force (link). Many companies in
industry may not realize that the PSSA may be relevant for their
kind of operation as article 4 PSSA defines security services very
broad. Following activities, amongst others, are defined as
security services and may require a license when provided
Operational and/or logistical support for armed- or security
forces Operating and maintaining weapon systems Advising or
training members of armed or security forces
Companies supplying products or services to armed- or security
forces should evaluate whether the rendered activities fall under
the reporting/license obligation of the PSSA. Especially those
companies dealing with dual-use or military goods, and/or being
contractually linked to armed- or security forces should conduct a
The federal agency has published a guideline dealing with
overlapping obligations of the PSSA, the goods control ordinance
and the war material ordinance respectively. It details certain
simplifications for services that are covered by a SECO export
license (available in German only: link).
Furthermore Swiss companies need to consider that services of
controlled foreign entities may be subject to the PSSA as well. The
definition of controlled entity follows the Swiss Code of
Obligation for holding companies and the Federal Law on Acquisition
of Real Estate by Persons Resident Abroad for partnerships.
Companies in control of foreign entities with contractual ties to
armed- and/or security forces should evaluate potential exposure to
the Swiss PSSA.
MME Compliance AG supports companies with the analysis of
potential PSSA reporting- and licensing obligations as well as the
implementation of appropriate compliance programs.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The recent case of Dickinson v NAL Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd is a "101" guide to how not to run a small business, providing insight into the pitfalls that can await any director or shareholder...
As the Brexit negotiations start, one direct impact is an interest from clients and advisers looking to have flexibility in their organisational structure ahead of any legislative or other changes being implemented.
An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation.
Any UK companies doing business with the rest of the EU, or even just in the UK but relying on customers and suppliers who deal with the rest of the EU, should be keeping an eye out for the ramifications of Brexit.
As of 6 April 2017, "large" businesses will be required by law to report on their UK payment practices twice per year.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).