Seven Senate Democrats called on the SEC to investigate any possible misconduct by the financial advisors of municipal entities in Puerto Rico during the years that led to the country's current "dire debt crisis." The proposed investigation would track misconduct pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act municipal bond requirements.

The Senators emphasized that Puerto Rico is facing approximately $71 billion in debt and an estimated pension liability of $46 billion, along with "debt service payments that consume more than one-third of its revenues." They explained that amendments to the Security Exchange Act pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act Section 975 require the MSRB to adopt, and to impose on financial professionals, rules that are "designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices . . . and, in general, to protect investors, municipal entities, obligated persons, and the public interest." The Senators emphasized that the Securities Exchange Act also grants broad enforcement and examination authority to the SEC and FINRA to implement the "municipal entity protection mandate."

The Senators observed that the SEC has devoted "significant attention" to municipal securities markets in past actions that include numerous field hearings from 2010 to 2011, which informed a 2012 report on the state of the municipal securities market. The Senators noted that this report called for "far-reaching reforms" in addition to Dodd-Frank Act registration requirements for municipal advisors, some of which have been implemented. The senators urged the SEC to provide an update on (i) the status of the 2012 recommendations, and (ii) whether the SEC needs new authorities in order to enhance its protection of municipal entities in Puerto Rico and elsewhere.

The Senators warned the SEC that if it fails to investigate adequately whether illegal conduct occurred in connection with the underwriting, sale, distribution and trading of Puerto Rican debt in the years leading up to the present crisis, then it's possible that "investors will not regain confidence in Puerto Rico's debt markets and Puerto Rico's access to normal credit markets will remain impaired."

Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (D-VT), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Jeffrey A. Merkley (D-OR) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) were the sole authors of the letter.

Commentary

Perhaps the questions that Congress should ask are these: Why are so many states, cities and municipal entities approaching insolvency? What factors drive governmental entities to run at unsustainable deficits? These are not trivial questions, since it is reasonable to expect that numerous governmental entities will go bust in the coming years. To borrow a phrase from the pols, "investors will not regain confidence in [governmental] debt" until the governments themselves prove they can break even at the very least. The federal government of the United States might be able to print money and make that currency valuable by mandating its use as collateral for financial transactions, but municipal entities cannot do the same. Eventually, those deficits cannot be sustained.

On a more parochial political note, why are two New York senators pushing for a portion of Puerto Rico's losses to be borne by financial institutions that tend largely to be based in New York, and that employ vast numbers of people across the City and the State? Advocating aggressively for measures that damage financial institutions based in New York would seem to injure the Senators' own constituents.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.