UK: Less Harmony, More Divergence? Intellectual Property Rights And Enforcement In A Post-Brexit UK

Last Updated: 7 June 2016
Article by Jo Joyce

There are a lot of uncertainties in the UK around intellectual property at the moment. Legal certainty is one of the key requirements for the rule of law; it's also essential for a healthy economy. Unfortunately the current uncertainty over the possibility of a Brexit goes beyond a lack of clarity on matters of legal principle, stretching to confusion over the future of the system itself.

IP lawyers are used to change. It's not always fast but there is constantly something on the horizon, as the law attempts to keep up with the pace of new technology. Because IP harmonisation has been a key priority for the European Union, most change in recent years has been designed to bring Member States closer together in how they manage the granting and enforcement of IP rights. If the UK opts to leave the EU on 23 June 2016, IP lawyers will have to learn to embrace a lot more change, regardless of the final political settlement.

The results of the UK simply exiting the EU without further negotiation are fairly easy to establish. However, we know that, if the 'Leave' campaign wins the day, there will be a lengthy negotiation process, through which UK will make arrangements for its future interactions with the remaining EU Member States across all areas, including intellectual property. What the IP landscape looks like in the aftermath of a departure from the EU will depend on the form of its future dealings with the EU and, in particular, on whether it joins the European Economic Area (EEA). The exit process would be likely to take at least two years and currently we have little idea of how it will be managed.

Trade marks and designs

Trade marks along with Registered Community Designs (RCDs) and Unregistered Community Designs, are the most harmonised forms of intellectual property in the EU and, therefore, the way that they are protected and enforced in the UK is likely to experience significant change if the UK leaves the EU.

A new reliance upon national protection

At present the UK is part of the EU Trade Mark regime (until recently known as the 'Community Trade Mark' and now EU Trade Marks - EUTMs) and the Registered Community Design regime. In addition to registered design rights there is an Unregistered EU Design Right which arises automatically upon creation of a design within the EU (or by an EU-based designer) which is of shorter duration. All of these rights entitle the holder to protection across the 28 Member States of the EU, achievable (in respect of the registered rights) through the filing of one application and payment of a single fee.

If the UK leaves the EU then, in theory, existing EUTMs and RCDs would not be valid in the UK because the UK would no longer be a party to the Regulations creating those rights. This could mean that current EUTM holders would have to register for UK national trade marks and designs to preserve protection in the UK. Existing registrations that have only, or primarily, been used in the UK, could be at risk of revocation for non-use post Brexit, since their owners would not be able to demonstrate use in a substantial part of the EU. It is likely that the UK IPO would offer EUTM holders the opportunity to convert their EUTMs to national marks within the UK, presumably upon payment of some sort of fee.

Those relying on unregistered design rights in the UK will also need to rethink their strategies. The UK has an equivalent of the Unregistered Community Design Right (UCDR) - UK Unregistered Designs, currently operating in parallel to the European right. UK unregistered design rights last longer than the European equivalent (ten years from the date of first sale, compared to the three years afforded by the EU system) but the scope of protection is narrower, covering the overall configuration of the design but excluding surface decoration. The good news for UK companies looking to enforce unregistered rights in the EU is that they would still be able to do so after Brexit, since the only requirement for ownership of a UCDR is that the goods have been put on sale in the EU. Within the UK, however, rights in surface design would have to be protected through UK design registration or by other means (such as copyright which may be a solution in some cases).


Bigger issues than the scope of registered and other harmonised rights will arise if the UK does not join the EEA after Brexit. At present a trade mark owner can object to goods being sold in the EEA (including the UK) if they have not consented to them being offered for sale within that market. Once a trade mark owner has sold or permitted goods bearing their mark to be sold in the EEA they cannot prevent further sales, their rights are said to be 'exhausted'. If the UK were not a member of the EEA, trade mark owners would potentially be able to restrict trading of goods between the UK and EEA Member States since trade in, for example France, would not exhaust trade mark (or other forms of IP right) in the UK and vice versa.


For rights holders, an important area of concern would be the practical management of their portfolios of registrations. For UK-based practitioners too, there is concern over the changes to practice that Brexit could bring.

For organisations or individuals used to managing their own trade mark matters with the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO – known until recently as OHIM), Brexit could add complication and expense. It is not currently necessary to have professional representation in proceedings before the EUIPO if the applicant/registrant is domiciled or principally doing business in an EEA jurisdiction. However for parties based outside the EEA, representation within the EEA is necessary for all but the most straightforward matters (exceptions being the filing or renewing of trade mark applications or applying to inspect files). Representatives, whether appointed through choice or necessity, must be based in the EEA in accordance with Article 93 of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 as amended). A representative should be a legal practitioner qualified to act as a representative in trade mark matters in one of the Member States of the EEA and have its place of business within the EEA. For practitioners in the UK this will mean a significant curtailing of business if the UK does not join the EEA, unless other arrangements are agreed.

Whereas the EU Trade Mark Regulation specifies that representatives may be domiciled in any EEA Member State, Article 78 of the Community Design Regulation (EU Regulation 6/2002) limits the representatives who may act before the office in respect of design matters, to those domiciled in EU Member States. For designs, therefore, even membership of the EEA would be insufficient to enable UK practitioners to continue acting on registered design matters without appointing an agent based in the EU to go on the record.

It is, of course, possible that the UK's access to and membership of the EU Trade Mark and Registered Design regime could be maintained through a bilateral agreement of some sort between the UK and the EU, though the appetite for this from the latter may not be high if the UK opts to leave.


At present, patent law across Europe is not generally harmonised by EU legislation and although a "European Patent" is available through the European Patent Office, it is, in effect, a bundle of national patents accessed via a central application process. The UK's access to the European Patent system is not dependent on being in the EU and it would continue as normal whatever the outcome of the Referendum. The key area likely to be affected, unless the issue is resolved upon exit, is that of supplementary protection certificate (SPCs). SPCs are available to extend the life of a patent (normally restricted to twenty years from the date of filing) for certain, limited types of invention (primarily pharmaceutical inventions). Since the SPC regime operates via an EU Regulation, it would not automatically apply to allow the grant of SPCs post Brexit. Many states have national SPC regimes however (Switzerland being one, which is based on the EU model) and Norway and Iceland have effectively opted in to the EU SPC regime through their EEA membership. It is possible that UK could come to a similar arrangement.

The bigger question in patent law is what impact Brexit would have on the progress of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC), for which UK support has been important. Unlike the current European patent, the Unitary Patent, once launched, will be tied to the EU. The UK's support for the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court scheme has been crucial to getting it off the ground and it is one of three nations which must ratify the final UPC Agreement. It is likely that Italy, as the next largest state for patent grant, will have to step up to replace UK as a ratifying party in the event of Brexit, but there are more practical concerns too. One of three Central Division Courts is to be based in London (this one dealing with disputes relating to life sciences patents) but post Brexit, it seems unlikely that it will remain in London. Despite this, Baroness Neville-Rolfe, the UK Minister for IP, has indicated that the government intends to proceed with preparing the London UPC centre and the UPC Agreement ratification process despite the looming Referendum.

Spain's refusal to join the UPC came as a blow to the scheme and it is possible that UK's withdrawal, as the loss of a major patent litigation centre to the Unified Patent Court plan, could damage it. However, the other contracting states may decide that the Unitary Patent and the UPC will still be a worthwhile venture without the UK's participation, in which case while Brexit may cause further delays to an already lengthy process, the UPC and the Unitary Patent would continue. Of course, given its prior commitment to the project, the UK may seek to continue its involvement through a bilateral arrangement but this is likely to require the UK's ongoing adherence to EU law on related matters (such as enforcement mechanisms) and indeed for it to be subject to CJEU decisions arising from references from the UPC. Whether the other participants and the EU would accept such a proposal is entirely uncertain.

Less harmonised areas

Although trade marks, registered designs and patents are the types of IP and areas of IP practice where Brexit would be most obviously felt, EU legislation and jurisprudence have had a substantial impact on other areas of IP.

Harmonisation of copyright law across the EU has not been as extensive as harmonisation efforts in other areas. The nature and application of copyright continues to vary considerably across EU Member States. Copyright law in the UK (primarily expressed in statute through the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)) has been shaped significantly by EU Directives but Brexit would not have any impact upon the immediate state of the law without repeal or amendment of the CDPA and related UK legislation. Similarly the EU concept of database right protecting "databases" has been incorporated into law in the UK through the Copyright and Rights in Databases Regulations 1997. Since, like copyright, a database right is an automatic right which exists as soon as the database exists in a recorded form and is conferred by UK legislation, rather than directly applicable EU legislation, there are no associated formalities associated with claiming the right that are likely to be complicated by Brexit.

One issue that would have to be addressed in relation to database right, however, is the fact that the UK statute refers to establishment in an EU Member State as being a necessary qualification to enjoy the right. Left unaltered post Brexit, this could inadvertently mean that those domiciled in the EU could benefit from database right in the UK but those domiciled in the UK would be excluded. This could, of course, be fixed very simply through a legislative amendment but it is indicative of how entwined EU and UK laws have become in the field of IP. All UK statutes enacted since the UK joined the EU would need to be checked with a fine tooth comb to avoid illogical outcomes caused by references to the EU.

Although EU efforts to harmonise copyright and related rights have not been as successful as efforts in other areas, there are nonetheless several proposals currently on the table that, if enacted at EU level, will have the effect of triggering greater harmonisation. In particular, the EU's Digital Single Market strategy envisions a much more consistent approach to copyright and related rights across Member States. It is unclear what the UK would do in relation to measures already tabled for incorporation into UK law or measures adopted at EU level after a UK vote to leave. Of course the UK may well decide to incorporate such measures into its national laws of its own volition in order to make access to the EU market possible, but whether this would be done wholesale or on a piecemeal basis is impossible to predict.

The EU has recently turned its attention to the protection of Trade Secrets with a new Directive on that topic, currently in draft form. At the moment, trade secrets are protected through the common law in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. If the UK remains in the EU it must adopt the Trade Secrets Directive, in which case the law relating to breach of confidence and misuse of confidential information (the tortious basis for many claims relating to trade secrets) may require adaptation to provide protection at the level required by the EU. In the event of Brexit, without having implemented the Directive, the UK may be out of step with a more harmonised approach to Trade Secret protection from the EU Member States. In this case UK may come under pressure to bring its laws in line with those of the EU whether or not it joins the EEA.

Human rights – the role of the ECtHR

One area in which many people are incorrectly anticipating change in the event of Brexit is the field of human rights law. While it is true that (depending on the terms of the exit agreement and subsequent agreements), the EU Charter on Fundamental Human Rights would cease to apply, withdrawal from the EU is not the same as withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights which the EU legislation mirrors in many respects (see our article for more on this).

Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are increasingly having an effect upon content, producers and hosts of user generated content in particular. Recent decisions have sought to establish the extent of website hosts' responsibility for third party copyright infringement and defamatory content as well as harassing and privacy-invading content. This is an ongoing challenge for content publishers and hosts and one that is not likely to be much impacted by Brexit.

IP litigation

The likely impact of Brexit on the IP litigation (for example, claims over copyright infringement in online publications) market has not been fully analysed and most comment on the issue is pure speculation. The UK may see its status as a venue of choice for some kinds of litigation diminish if it is unable to offer pan-European solutions. Claimants without the appetite or resources to run multiple claims may prefer to pursue a case in an EU Member State and forego pursuit in the UK. Having said that, the recently founded jurisdiction of the English court to grant cross-border declarations of non-infringement of patents would remain unaffected, as it is not based on EU rules.

There will also be a broader jurisdictional issue for claimants in the UK courts seeking to enforce their judgments (on IP and other matters) against foreign defendants. After Brexit, unless otherwise agreed, the UK will not have the benefit of the Brussels Regulation (as recently recast), dealing with allocation of jurisdiction, the enforcement and reciprocity of judgments across the EU Member States. The UK could seek to rely on the Hague Convention (though it would need to re-sign this separately to the EU) which provides a degree of reciprocity but only for final decisions, not interim relief (such as interim injunctions or freezing orders). More likely the UK would seek to join the Lugano Convention which provides for very similar reciprocity to EU Member States but extends to the EFTA countries.

IP – Not likely to affect the Brexit decision but certain to feel its effects

Since we know that any decision to leave the EU will be followed by withdrawal negotiations and an adjustment period likely to last several years, the most important thing for IP practitioners and owners to remember is that there is currently no need to panic.

If UK stays in the EU then the status quo will persist. If the UK leaves then the primary areas of concern will be working out what to do about EU rights currently valid in the UK and how to handle ongoing litigation involving such rights. More broadly, the UK will have to plan its transition to ensure that the decisions of UK courts are respected and enforceable beyond our borders. Whilst this might involve EEA and/or Lugano Convention membership, any number of mechanisms could be employed to achieve the desired ends.

Practically speaking, brand owners will have to invest time and probably money in considering and revising their registered IP portfolios. Commercial arrangements will have to be checked and reviewed to ensure that rights licensed include the relevant rights in the UK if defined terms related to EU rights.

In respect of UK rights, without a repeal of domestic legislation implementing EU Directives (such as the Trade Marks Act and the CDPA) not much will change in the immediate future, even after the conclusion of any Brexit. There would probably be a gradual divergence of case law, since although decisions of other EU courts and the CJEU would probably still be considered by courts in the UK, they would no longer be binding as precedent and, in time, they would become less persuasive (although there may be commercial imperatives to following them or incorporating their effect into UK law in addition to any post-Brexit commitments).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.